Intelligent parameter checking device

Abstract

The invention provides an intelligent parameter checking device which comprises a page processing unit and / or a server processing unit, wherein the page processing unit comprises a rule reading module, a parameter acquisition module, a checker expansion module, a parameter checking module and an exception handling module, and the server processing unit comprises a rule reading module, a parameter acquisition module, a checker expansion module, a parameter checking module, an exception handling module and a rule conversion module. The device has the following advantages: 1, high code reuse rate, 2, wide application scope, 3, flexible checking rule representation form, 4, easiness in use and expansion, 5, improvement of user experience and perception, 6, improvement of development efficiency, and 7, lowered maintenance cost.

Description

【Technical Field】 [0001] The invention relates to an intelligent parameter verification device. 【Background technique】 [0002] In the process of project development, data validity verification is a headache for software product developers, but it is definitely necessary. [0003] For Web projects, both client verification and server verification are indispensable. The client script verification is used to improve user experience and perception, and the server verification is mainly for the verification of data security and legality. However, in the hard-coded era, all codes are written in the program. When implementing these two verifications, the following problems will be found: [0004] 1. The client-side verification code is relatively cumbersome to write and error-prone, mainly due to spelling errors; [0005] 2. When the business adjustment or verification method does not meet the requirements, developers need to re-read the code to modify; [0006] 3. The verification of ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0004] 1. The client verification code is relatively cumbersome to write and prone to errors, mainly spelling mistakes;

[0005] 2. When the business adjustment or verification method does not meet the requirements, developers need to re-read the code to modify;

[0006] 3. It is very cumbersome to maintain the consistency of server-side verification and client-side verification (the client-side verification input cannot exceed 10 characters, and the server-side should also be controlled at 10 characters accordingly, and when modifying, the client and service terminal synchronous modification, the prompt information must be input again at the front and rear ends, which is cumbersome), and consumes research and development time

[0007] 4. A bunch of codes are rewritten or copied every time the form verification is implemented, and the codes are not concise enough; for interface development, there is also the dilemma of rewriting or copying a bunch of codes in the parameter verification method;

[0008] In addition, the existing parameter verification devices generally have disadvantages such as poor versatility (the front and back verification codes are difficult to reuse and coupled with the framework), poor scalability, and not easy to use (complex configuration and implementation).

Images