Fixture and system for debugging parameters of naked-eye 3D display device

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of the naked-eye 3D technology, especially to a tool and system for debugging a parameter of a naked-eye 3D display device. The tool comprises a first support unit, a pedestal, and a second support unit. The first support unit that is arranged at one side of the pedestal and is fixedly connected with the pedestal is used for placing a to-be-measured display device; the second support unit that is opposite to the first support unit and is connected with the pedestal in a sliding mode is provided with a camera unit for obtaining a 3D display parameter of the to-be-measured display device. With the tool and system, the naked-eye 3D display device parameter debugging accuracy and debugging efficiency can be improved.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of naked-eye 3D, in particular, to a jig and a system for debugging parameters of a naked-eye 3D display device. Background technique [0002] With the continuous development of the 3D display industry, people have higher and higher requirements for 3D display. When traditional 3D display is difficult to get rid of the shackles of wearable devices, glasses-free 3D display has attracted more and more attention. There are many ways of naked-eye 3D display, but at present, whether it is a large-screen commercial naked-eye 3D display or a small-screen personal consumer naked-eye 3D display, the lenticular glass-free 3D display technology has great advantages. Compared with large-screen commercial glasses-free 3D displays, small-screen personal consumer glasses-free 3D displays (such as glasses-free 3D tablets, glasses-free 3D laptops, etc.) have a wider audience and greater commercial value. To obtain ...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

There are some disadvantages in this debugging method: ① When viewed by human eyes, the randomness is large

The interpupillary distance (that is, the distance between the eyes) of different testers is not the same, and the difference in interpupillary distance leads to differences in the 3D parameters obtained through debugging.

In addition, it is difficult for the tester to grasp the pitch angle between the eyes and the tablet under test during debugging, which may also cause differences in 3D parameters

②The left and right eyes of the tester watch different test images for a long time, it is easy to get tired, and even cause damage to the eyes

③Purely manual operation, the work efficiency is relatively low, which is not conducive to mass production of products

[0003] It can be seen that the existing methods for debugging the parameters of naked-eye 3D display devices mostly rely on manual methods, and the accuracy and efficiency of debugging are difficult to meet the actual needs of parameter debugging for naked-eye 3D display devices.

Images