Scheme decision-making method and device and server

Abstract

The invention provides a scheme decision method and device and a server. The method comprises the steps: determining a first account set and a second account set corresponding to a to-be-decided target event; obtaining decision indexes of writing accounts in the first account set into a target block chain, and determining a first target decision index from the decision indexes; obtaining a secondtarget decision index obtained after accounts in the second account set are adjusted based on the first target decision index, and an index weight of the provided second target decision index, and then determining a final scheme from preset alternative schemes of the target event. In the method disclosed in the present invention, the first account set and the second account set participating in the decision making correspond to a to-be-decided target event; the decision index is a consensus result of the first account set, the index weight is a consensus result of the second account set, and the consensus mechanism is beneficial to improving the scientific rationality of the decision index and the index weight thereof, thereby being beneficial to improving the scientificity and accuracy oftarget event decision.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of consensus decision-making, in particular to a scheme decision-making method, device and server. Background technique [0002] In the related technology, the decision-making problem may be handled in a manner of multi-person voting. Specifically, for a target event, multiple alternatives are pre-determined, as well as the people who participate in the voting; then one person, one vote is used to vote, and the alternative with the most votes is determined as the final one. However, if most of the voters are unfamiliar with the target event and only a few are familiar with the target event, the final solution determined is likely to be suboptimal and the decision-making error rate is high. In another way, voters usually have relatively fixed voting weights. For example, voters are assigned voting weights according to their investment shares. However, in this way, the voting weight of people has noth...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, if most of the people participating in the voting are relatively unfamiliar with the target event, and only a few people are familiar with the target event, it is easy to cause the final solution determined to be not the optimal solution, and the decision-making error rate is high

In another way, voters usually have relatively fixed voting weights. For example, voters are assigned voting weights according to their investment shares. However, in this way, the voting weight of people has nothing to do with their familiarity with the target event. It is difficult to scientifically and accurately make decisions on target events

Images