Membrane based volatile component-removal devices for liquid chromatography
a liquid chromatography and volatile component technology, applied in liquid degasification, separation processes, instruments, etc., can solve the problems of high background current and noise, limitation that the cosub>2 /sub>had to traverse through the tubing wall material, and the fragility of silicone rubber tubing used in the above work
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0082]Construction of CO2 Removal Device (GRD)
[0083]This example will be described with respect to FIGS. 2(a) and (b). Microporous tubular polypropylene membranes (400 μm i.d., 25 μm wall, nominal pore size 0.02 μm, surface porosity 40%, Celgard X-20, Celanese Corp., Charlotte, N.C.) were coated with silicone rubber by immersing the membrane tube in a solution of silicone rubber adhesive (Macklanburg-Duncan or General Electric, translucent type for household use) in hexane. Unless otherwise stated, the concentration was 1.5-2% (w / v). A length of the membrane tube was pulled through the solution in one direction and then pulled back in the opposite direction. The membrane was then suspended vertically and allowed to dry in a dust free enclosure for ≧4 h. The desired length of the coated membrane tube 20 was cut and a 200 μm diameter nylon monofilament (4 lb strength, STREN, duPont) was inserted, in the hollow fiber, with ends of the filament protruding out of the fiber. One end of th...
example 2
[0115]A DX600 system from Dionex Corp. was used in this work. A gas permeable tubing (400 um id.×150 cm length) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,439,736 was obtained from Neomecs (Eden Prairie, Minn.) and installed in a device as illustrated in FIG. 1. The device is designated as a GRD and is used for removal of carbon dioxide. The device was then installed as a post suppressor device as shown in FIG. 1. A large loop injection (1 mL sample loop) was done using a tap water sample. A control run was done without the GRD using AS18 chemistry and 23 mM NaOH at 1 ml / min (shown in FIG. 11A) and compared to a run done with the GRD (shown in FIG. 11B). The suppressor waste (a base) was diverted into the GRD as a fluidic flow to aid removal of the carbon dioxide and then diverted to waste. The results indicate a substantial portion of the carbonate peak is removed as per the present invention.
example 3
[0116]The experimental conditions were similar to Example 2 except a standard mixture comprising of 7 anion standards was analyzed with a proprietary column from Dionex Corp. with 38 mM NaOH at 1.2 mL / min flow rate and a 25 μL injection loop. The run done without the GRD (FIG. 12A) shows that the carbonate peak elutes close to Nitrite which makes it difficult to quantitate the Nitrite peak. The run done with the GRD (FIG. 12B) on the other hand showed removal of the peak corresponding to carbonate, thus leading to improved integration for Nitrite.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| concentration | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| coating thickness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| coating thickness | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


