Code coverage rate processing method and device and computer equipment

Abstract

The invention relates to a code coverage rate processing method and device, computer equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the steps of obtaining a difference method of a second type offiles obtained by testing a second version of a second source code of an application program relative to a first type of files obtained by testing a first version of a first source code of the application program; obtaining second sub-code coverage rate data of the difference method and third sub-code coverage rate data except the second sub-code coverage rate data from the code coverage rate data file of the second source code; obtaining first sub-code coverage rate data except the code coverage rate data corresponding to the difference method from the code coverage rate data file of the first source code; and combining the first sub-code coverage rate data and the third sub-code coverage rate data to obtain fourth sub-code coverage rate data, and generating a third code coverage rate data file according to the second sub-code coverage rate data and the fourth sub-code coverage rate data. The method can reduce repeated code tests.

Description

technical field [0001] The present application relates to the technical field of software testing, in particular to a code coverage processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium. Background technique [0002] In software testing, it is usually necessary to perform code coverage statistics on the software testing process. Code coverage represents the extent to which code can be covered by tests. Generally, software testers decide whether software testing needs to be repeated based on the level of code coverage. [0003] In current software testing, the release version of an application program consists of N measurable minor versions. That is, for each version released to the outside world, the developer will submit multiple small versions of the software development kit to the server. However, for each submitted minor version, because the identification codes of the compiled products after software testing are different, the code coverage data obtained d...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, for each submitted minor version, due to the different identification codes of the compiled products after software testing, the code coverage data obtained during the testing process between minor versions cannot be directly merged

If the coverage data between minor versions cannot be merged, directly referring to the code coverage data of the current minor version will easily lead to repeated testing

For example, the current minor version and the previous minor version both contain a certain code, and a certain code has been tested and covered in the previous version but not in the current minor version. At this time, referring to the code coverage data of the current minor version needs to be Code is retested, thus causing repeated testing of that code

Images