The main
disadvantage of traditional condoms is that it takes a long time and much effort to unpack and put on a condom.
It is not possible to open the
package without looking at it.
Such change or position and necessity to release the other hand is the main reason of
distraction of the user's mind from
sexual intercourse and large amount of time spent to put on the condom.
Some people do not use condoms even when necessary, and the main reason for this is that they have to spend a long time and much effort to put a condom on, and also change position, resulting in
distraction of their minds from the sexual intercourse.
However, it is not easy to hold the condom with one hand using these ribbons, excluding the case when the ribbons are connected to a rigid base actually forming a holder.
However, the problems related to unpacking process remain unsolved even with these holders.
This inconvenience nullifies the potential advantages of holders.
Precise manipulations of both hands are necessary for unpacking the condom using this device, and furthermore, the condom may be damaged by the blades.
It should be noted that none of the prior art disclose a device
usable with packed condoms held by a holder, that is durable, compact and conveniently openable.
All methods described above also distract the user, as well as require his concentration and both his hands.
Devices of this type are unpractical due to their
large size and complex structure.
However, this process of breaking protective sheets by
penis is uncomfortable for the user.
Further, if the film is so thin that it can be pierced by penis, it means that the condom cannot be stored in real-life conditions, and can be easily damaged.
Therefore, the condom is to be stored in some other
package e.g. a paper envelope, thus,
package problem still remains.
As a result, the package is stretched and torn along the weakened line.
The aforementioned procedure is not convenient for the user and uses skill to perform it using one hand.
Holding a soft package pressing it to the palm with the fingers while tearing the package by the
thumb placed in the pouch seems to be uncomfortable.
Incorporation of a weakened line into a condom package does not contribute to safety: the package could be torn while stored in the pocket.
Extracting the package from the box makes the procedure of putting on the condom more complicated and uses the second hand.
It shall also be noted that a condom described in WO9846495 (
Flock, 1998) is not provided with a holder that would allow the user to put the condom on using one hand, therefore
Flock does not solve the problem of conveniently putting on a condom.
When the pin is removed, the spring pushes the holder outside the box, and this leads to tearing the package remaining in a
fixed position being attached to the box.
However, the unpacking procedure still needs concentration because the user has to hold the box with one hand, remove the pin with the other hand and then grip with his hand the unpacked holder.
Further, the device has other disadvantages.
This can lead to undesirable results.
Apparently, this action in this position is uncomfortable for the user, and requires sufficient dexterity.
Furthermore, such a “gun” is unpractical because it is far bigger than pocket size.