Nanoparticulate statin formulations and novel statin combinations
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Examples
example 1
[0168]The purpose of this example was to prepare nanoparticulate dispersions of lovastatin, and to test the prepared compositions for stability at varying temperatures.
[0169]Four formulations of lovastatin were milled, as described in Table 1, by milling the components of the compositions under high energy milling conditions in a DYNO®-Mill KDL (Willy A. Bachofen AG, Maschinenfabrik, Basle, Switzerland) for 2 to 3 hours until the desired particle size was achieved.
[0170]Formulation 1 comprised 5% (w / w) lovastatin, 1.25% (w / w) Hydroxypropylcellulose, super-low viscosity grade (HPC-SL), and 0.05% (w / w) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DOSS).
[0171]Formulation 2 comprised 5% (w / w) lovastatin, 1.25% (w / w) hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), and 0.05% (w / w) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DOSS).
[0172]Formulation 3 comprised 5% (w / w) lovastatin, 1.25% (w / w) Povidone USP, Plasdone® K29 / 52 (PVPK29\32), and 0.05% (w / w) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DOSS).
[0173]Formulation 4 comprised 5% (w / w) ...
example 2
[0175]As described in the literature (Pharmazie, Volume 56, September 2001, p 738-740), lovastatin has a potential for oxidative degradation. To determine which of the formulations exhibited the least amount of degradants an HPLC analysis was performed on the compositions prepared in Example 1.
[0176]The method was a reversed phase HPLC method based on an existing assay method found in the literature (Pharmazie, Volume 56, September 2001, p 738-740). The results of these sample runs were compared to an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), commercially available lovastatin, standard to determine which milled sample was least oxidized.
[0177]Analysis took place after 4-5 weeks of storage. The four different samples were compared to an API standard. For this comparison three factors were used to determine which formulation was optimal: (1) the percent lovastatin, (2) overall appearance of impurity profile, and (3) the percent area of the peak at RRT 0.87. This peak was selected was be...
example 3
[0180]The purpose of this example was to evaluate the efficacy of nanoparticulate lovastatin compositions.
[0181]New Zealand White rabbits were fed a diet enriched with 1% cholesterol for four weeks. At the four week time point the animals were maintained on a high cholesterol diet but were dosed (in the fed state) each day for a additional four week period with 6 mg / kg dose of either suspensions of Formulation #2 (Example 1) or commercially available lovastatin (Mevacor®) tablets mortarized into a crude suspension comprising the same quantities of HPMC and DOSS as Formulation #2. Placebo also comprised the same quantities of HPMC and DOSS as formulation #2.
[0182]Blood samples for total cholesterol analysis were taken at −2, 0, 2, & 4 weeks after dosing. Total change in cholesterol for each group was as follows:
[0183]1. Mevacor® mortarized tablets dosed as a liquid suspension: −17.8% (N=6) 2. Formulation #2 dosed as a liquid suspension: −23.2% (N=8) 3. Placebo dosed as a liquid suspe...
PUM
Property | Measurement | Unit |
---|---|---|
Fraction | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Fraction | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Fraction | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com