System and method for determining by an external entity the human hierarchial structure of an rganization, using public social networks
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0027]Corporation 1 is an international IT Corporation which provides products and services to customers around the world. According to the company's web page, the company currently employs more than 50,000 employees. An organization crawler was used in step 12 of FIG. 1 as described in more detail with respect to FIG. 2 to collect data on the Corporation 1 employees in South and North America, Asia, Eastern Europe, and Asia. The crawling process was terminated after discovering 45,266 informal links between 5,793 Facebook users who, according to their Facebook profile page, worked in the corporation. The procedure also succeeded in collecting information on the company positions of 1,619 employees. Out of 1,619 employees, the procedure succeeded in identifying 463 holding management positions (step 15 of FIG. 1) in a manner which will be described in more detail hereinafter. A wide range of departments was identified in different parts of the globe: Senior management positions, sal...
example 2
[0032]Table 1 illustrates the verification of the leadership identification procedure for the top 10 and top 20 employees as identified, using the various centrality measures. The results indicate that each of the calculated centrality measures can assist in identifying managers within an organization. The table shows this verification as done for two small organizations S1 and S2, two medium size organizations M1 and M2, and two large scale corporations L1 and L2. The various centrality measures that have been used are listed in the top row, and are as follows: closeness centrality (Closeness), Betweenness (BC), eigvector centrality (EC), HITS, PageRank, Communicability Centrality (CC), and Load Centrality (LC). Closeness demonstrated the highest average precision at 20 (0.78), while PageRank received the lowest score (0.7).
TABLE 1Org.CategoryDegreeClosenessBCHitsPageRankECCCLCS1Top 100.50.40.60.30.50.30.30.6Top 200.350.30.30.30.250.30.30.3S2Top 100.80.90.80.90.70.90.90.8Top 200.70...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 