Abrasive blast modification of surfaces
a technology of surface treatment and abrasive blast, which is applied in the field of surface treatment techniques, can solve the problems of limited application of this technology to the deposition of non-metallic materials, natural contamination of metal surfaces, titanium and titanium derived alloys, etc., and achieve the effect of good deposition of polymer dopants
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0104]An aluminium sample was electrolytically plated to produce a uniform 12 micron thick metallic Ni layer. This surface was then subjected to a CoBlast surface treatment using alumina as the abrasive and calcium phosphate as the dopant. The powders were pre-mixed and blasted at the surface. As can be seen from the optical micrographs in FIG. 4 and the EDX analysis in FIG. 5, following the CoBlast treatment the nickel was still evident on the surface of the substrate, indicating that there was less than 12 microns eroded from the substrate surface. In addition, the EDX shows the presence of additional elements attributed to the presence of the calcium phosphate dopant impregnated into the surface. Close examination of the optical micrographs in FIG. 4 shows that all of the nickel plating is not removed during the CoBlast treatment. However, it can be seen that there is some level of nickel removal from the surface during CoBlast, based on the cross-sectional analysis. Although the...
example 2
[0105]150 micron alumina abrasive was mixed with calcium phosphate (Hydroxyapatite or HA, 20-65 micron average particle size) and blasted at a series of grade 2 titanium coupons. The velocity of the bombarding particle was varied from 170-195 m / sec. Samples were then washed and examined using SEM. In each case, the surface was found to be loaded with high levels of calcium and phosphorous, confirming that calcium phosphate had been deposited in each case. Samples were also subjected to XRD analysis. In each case, the analysis detected only peaks associated with titanium and the calcium phosphate deposit. Analysis of the ratio of the intensity of the HA (211) peak to the intensity of the Ti (101) peak showed approximately equivalent signals for all samples.
[0106]The adhesion of the deposited material was measured using a test method based on ASTM F1147. This determined that the adhesion of the deposit was in excess of 58 MPa, which was the failure point of the adhesive.
[0107]This exp...
example 3
[0110]A series of 1 mm thick Grade 5 titanium samples were subjected to abrasive bombardment using a 50:50 mixture of 100 micron alumina abrasive and hydroxyapatite (25-60 microns particle distribution) and a bombardment height of 41 mm. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to quantify the velocity of the bombarding particles. The samples were subject to bombardment at various particle velocities and the surface of the blasted substrates was then subjected to 5 minutes cleaning in an ultrasonic bath filled with deionised water. The samples were air dried and then analysed using SEM-EDX. Signals arising from lighter element such as carbon and oxygen were not measured and instead the analysis focussed on the heavier elements of Ca, P and Ti.
[0111]At velocities less than 100 m / sec, there was minimal hydroxyapatite detected on the surface of the titanium coupons. At velocities in excess of 100 m / sec, there was significant hydroxyapatite loading of the metal. Samples blasted at a ve...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| velocity | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| velocity | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| velocity | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


