A vehicle front collision avoidance method and system

A vehicle and collision avoidance technology, applied in the traffic field, can solve the problems of conservative braking strategy, frequent warning or braking, and driver interference.

Active Publication Date: 2019-04-09
NIO CO LTD
View PDF6 Cites 6 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0005] In actual use, the above-mentioned method of formulating a collision warning strategy or an active collision avoidance strategy only from the longitudinal braking of vehicles to avoid collisions will cause too much interference to the driver if the warning or braking is too frequent, and the braking strategy is relatively conservative. Collisions cannot be avoided to the greatest extent

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • A vehicle front collision avoidance method and system
  • A vehicle front collision avoidance method and system
  • A vehicle front collision avoidance method and system

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment 1

[0106] The first collision avoidance distance d 1 Determined as the sum of the estimated relative displacement within the driver’s reaction time and the estimated relative displacement of the vehicle when braking, the first collision avoidance distance d 1 The specific formula is:

[0107]

[0108] Among them, |·| is the absolute value symbol, v rel is the relative speed between the vehicle and the obstacle in front, because the relative speed is usually obtained by subtracting the speed of the vehicle from the speed of the obstacle, the relative speed is generally a negative value; T d It is the time required for the driver to respond after the warning (when the vehicle actively avoids collision, set T d is taken as 0 seconds), under different traffic conditions T d May take different values, generally T d The value is 1.2 seconds; a x,sv It is the preset ego vehicle braking longitudinal deceleration, which is a negative value.

[0109] It should be noted that, accor...

Embodiment 2

[0111] When calculating the first collision avoidance distance d 1 When , the current relative acceleration or the current longitudinal acceleration of the obstacle in front is also included. It should be noted that the current relative acceleration and the current longitudinal acceleration of the obstacle ahead can be converted to each other through the relationship between the two and the preset braking longitudinal deceleration of the vehicle. The first collision avoidance distance d 1 The specific calculation formula is calculation formula 1:

[0112]

[0113] Among them, v rel is the current relative velocity, a rel is the current relative acceleration, a x,sv is the preset braking longitudinal deceleration of the vehicle, T d is the driver reaction time. It should be noted that, according to different traffic conditions and different collision avoidance purposes, a x,sv There can be different presets. In addition, it should be noted that the relative accelerat...

Embodiment 3

[0118] When calculating the first collision avoidance distance d 1 When , it also considers whether the obstacle in front is in a deceleration state and stops before the vehicle.

[0119]Taking the collision avoidance warning to the driver as an example, when the obstacle ahead is not in the preset working condition, when calculating the collision avoidance distance, the distance between the vehicle and the obstacle ahead within the driver's reaction time is included. The estimated distance change; the preset working condition is that the obstacle in front is decelerating and stops before the vehicle, while the obstacle in front is not in the preset working condition including: the obstacle in front is in a state where the speed does not change ( static state or constant speed state), or the obstacle in front is in the state of acceleration, or the obstacle in front is in the state of deceleration and stops behind the vehicle. The specific algorithm can be:

[0120] Judgment...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

The invention relates to a vehicle front collision avoidance method and system. The method comprises the steps of determining the current speed of a vehicle and the current speed of a front obstacle;determining a collision avoidance mode which is about to be adopted by the vehicle, wherein the collision avoidance mode comprises single braking collision avoidance, single steering collision avoidance or combination of braking collision avoidance and steering collision avoidance; calculating a collision avoidance distance corresponding to the determined collision avoidance mode through a set operation formula according to the current speed and the determined collision avoidance mode; determining a current distance between the vehicle and a front obstacle; judging whether the current distancereaches the collision avoidance distance or not, and if yes, it is judged that the collision avoidance condition is met. Braking and steering collision avoidance are comprehensively considered, the collision avoidance frequency can be effectively reduced, interference to a driver is reduced, and driving habits are better met.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention relates to a collision avoidance method in the traffic field, in particular to a method and a system for avoiding collision ahead of a vehicle. Background technique [0002] About 90% of traffic accidents are caused by the driver's inattention. Forward Collision Warning (FCW, Forward Collision Warning) or the vehicle's active collision avoidance according to the collision avoidance strategy can effectively reduce or avoid such accidents happened. The pros and cons of forward collision warning strategies or active collision avoidance strategies not only affect the safety performance of vehicles, but also affect the driving experience. For example, inappropriate forward collision warning strategies or active collision avoidance strategies will cause too much interference to drivers. . [0003] The existing forward collision warning strategy only considers the longitudinal braking of vehicles to avoid collisions. The warning logic is: by d...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): B60W30/09B60W30/095
CPCB60W10/18B60W10/20B60W30/09B60W30/0956B60W50/14B60W2050/143B60W2520/10B60W2710/18B60W2710/20B60W2554/4042B60T2201/022B60W30/095B60W30/16B60W2540/30B60W2554/4044B60W2554/804B60W2556/10
Inventor 孙鹏
Owner NIO CO LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap