Driving assistance system, driving assistance method
A driving assistance system and status technology, applied in the field of driving assistance systems, can solve problems such as unguaranteed identification and inability to identify headlights as two lights
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
no. 1 approach
[0030] [1-1. Structure]
[0031] Such as figure 1 As shown, the driving assistance system 2 includes an image processing device 1 . The image processing device 1 is an ECU mounted on a vehicle. ECU is an abbreviation for Electronic Control Unit. The image processing device 1 includes a known microcomputer including a CPU 101 and a semiconductor memory 103 such as RAM, ROM, and flash memory. Various functions of the image processing device 1 are realized by the CPU executing programs stored in a non-migrating, tangible recording medium. In this example, the semiconductor memory corresponds to a non-transferable physical recording medium in which the program is stored. In addition, by executing the program, the method corresponding to the program is executed. In addition, the image processing device 1 may include one microcomputer, or may include a plurality of microcomputers. In addition, the image processing apparatus 1 may be realized by a digital circuit including a pl...
no. 2 approach
[0063] [2-1. Differences from the First Embodiment]
[0064] The basic configuration of the second embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, so the differences will be described below.
[0065] In the aforementioned first embodiment, the exposure time T when the camera captures the image is used as an important factor affecting brightness to determine whether the image is in a recognizable state or in an unrecognizable state. On the other hand, the second embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that the illuminance L around the vehicle is used as an important factor affecting brightness to determine whether an image is recognizable or unrecognizable.
[0066] [2-2. Processing]
[0067] Next, use Figure 6 The flowchart of the second embodiment is replaced by the CPU 101 of the image processing device 1 of the second embodiment figure 2 The driving assistance processing_2 executed by the driving assistance processing_1 of the first embodiment shown wil...
no. 3 approach
[0085] [3-1. Differences from the First Embodiment]
[0086] The basic configuration of the third embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment, so differences will be described below.
[0087] In the aforementioned first embodiment, the exposure time T when the camera captures the image is used as an important factor affecting brightness to determine whether the image is in a recognizable state or an unrecognizable state. On the other hand, the third embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that the luminance distribution in the image is used as an important factor affecting brightness to determine whether the image is recognizable or unrecognizable.
[0088] [3-2. Processing]
[0089] Next, use Figure 7 The flow chart of the above is replaced by the CPU 101 of the image processing device 1 of the third embodiment figure 2 The driving assistance processing_3 executed by the driving assistance processing_1 of the first embodiment shown will be describ...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


