Method for evaluating physical quality consistency of cigarettes produced at multiple points
An evaluation method and consistency technology, applied in the field of tobacco quality control, can solve the problems of restricting product quality, quality improvement and promotion, lack of scientific basis for consistency evaluation methods, and insufficient mining of cigarette physical quality information, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0046] Choose the bigger certain brand specification cigarette of multi-point production scale, have 5 production points to produce this brand specification, each production point selects the cigarette sample of a batch of supervisory inspection (this embodiment sample is the random inspection of monthly supervisory inspection sample). In order to facilitate the comparison of analysis methods and results of different physical quality indicators, the same set of data was used for analysis.
[0047] The current methods for judging the physical quality of cigarettes:
[0048] According to GB / T 5606.6-2005 Cigarette Part 6: Quality Comprehensive Judgment Method, the deductions and rankings of physical quality indicators of cigarette samples from 5 production points are shown in Table 1. Since factory E has no physical quality defects, it is determined that factory E is the production point with the best physical quality control level in this supervision and inspection. The curre...
Embodiment 2
[0076] In order to further illustrate the characteristics of the inventive method, select the same production point and cigarette brand specifications as in Example 1, and on the basis of Example 1, continuously track the physical quality control situation of cigarettes in the next month.
[0077] (1) The detection of relevant standard indicators is the same as in Example 1, and the detection results are shown in Table 7.
[0078] Table 7 Test results of physical quality indicators of cigarettes
[0079]
[0080] (2) The normalization of each physical quality index by the power function method is the same as in Example 1, and the normalization calculation results are shown in Table 8.
[0081] Table 8 Normalized results of power function method
[0082]
[0083] (3) The calculation of the M value is the same as in Example 1, and the results are shown in Table 9.
[0084] (4) The consistency calculation of the physical quality of the cigarette is the same as in Example ...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


