There has been some resistance to the implementation of these more automated systems, and those reasons include the initial costs, the maintenance costs, and the perceived need for costly
technical support staff to maintain the systems.
Where more sophisticated components require service, or new components are to be added to the
system, the level of technical skill and the degree of complexity of the work needed to implement the addition increases dramatically.
Additionally, the down time to a table or pit that can be caused by the introduction or new components can be significant, further increasing the effective cost of the
system.
The proposed systems have also been complex and sophisticated in their
software and communication requirements.
At least these factors would lead to significant resistance within the industry for the installation of the more highly automated systems.
The use of playing cards provided by a live dealer has a number of associated limitations and disadvantages that have long plagued the casino industry.
Others are problems associated with the use of playing cards in particular games.
The use of playing cards at live table games typically involves several
operational requirements that are time-consuming.
These manipulations take time and are not typically appreciated by either the dealer or players because they distract from the play and entertainment value of the game.
The use of physical cards also adds a regular recurring cost to play of the game in the wear on decks of cards that must be replaced every few hours.
When
shuffling is needed, it involves a break in the action of the table game and consumes a significant amount of time.
Thus, earnings are limited by the number of hands that can be played per hour.
Accomplishing this without detracting from player enjoyment and desire to play the game is a challenging and longstanding issue with casino owners and consultants in the gaming industry.
The amount of time consumed by collecting,
shuffling and dealing is also of significance in private card games because it also delays action and requires some special effort to perform.
In private games there is also some added complexity due to card players remembering or figuring out which player had previously dealt and who should now shuffle and re-deal the cards as needed.
In the gaming industry there is also a very significant amount of time and effort devoted to security issues that relate to play of the casino games.
Part of the security concerns stem from frequent attempts to cheat during play of the games.
The amount of
cheating in card games is significant to the casino industry and constitutes a major security problem that has large associated losses.
The costs of efforts to deter or prevent
cheating are very large and made on a daily basis.
The
disadvantage of this approach is that not all cards dealt are easily imaged from a camera position above the table because some or all of the cards are not dealt face-up, or are hidden by overlying cards.
The covered cards of the players do not allow the rank, suit or order of dealt cards to be ascertained from an above-table camera or on table mounted cameras.
Even where cameras are used, their use may not be effective.
Such cameras may require time-consuming and tedious human analysis to go over the videotapes or other recordings of table action or require the use of
software that is complex and imprecise.
Such human analysis is costly and cannot economically be used to routinely monitor all action in a casino card room or table game pit.
For the above reasons, the
video camera monitoring techniques have found very limited effectiveness as a routine approach for identifying
cheating.
There has also been relatively limited use as a serious analytical tool because of the difficulty of analysis.
Such camera surveillance techniques are of limited effectiveness as a deterrent because the analysis is completed after the player is gone from the table.
Additionally, many cheats have a working knowledge of their limitations and utilize approaches that are not easily detectable by such systems.
More routine and
general screening to detect cheating has remained a difficult and continuing problem for casinos.
The most significant cost in operation gaming tables is the personnel costs.
This approach allows for
electronic data acquisition, but provides a high cost solution to the problem