During printing, stray droplets of ink, dust, paper fibers and other debris can accumulate around the nozzles on the
orifice plate surface and interfere with the trajectory of subsequently ejected ink droplets, thereby affecting print quality.
However, the combination of small nozzles and quick-
drying ink leaves the printheads susceptible to clogging, in this case not only from the dried ink and minute
dust particles or paper fibers, but also from the solids within the inks themselves.
Further, this dried ink is more difficult to remove than previously used dye-based inks when dried.
These characteristics compound the problems affecting print quality mentioned above.
Another characteristic of these
pigment-based inks contributes to the
nozzle clogging problem.
Unfortunately, the dispersant tends to form a tough film on the printhead
orifice plate face as the ink “vehicle” or carrier component of the
pigment-based ink evaporates.
Besides the debris accumulated on the printhead face from ink over-spray, paper crashes and printer priming for example, this dispersant film also attracts and binds
paper dust and other contaminants as well as solids from the ink itself.
It has been recognized that this film, as well as ink residue and debris surrounding the printhead nozzles, is quite difficult to remove from the printhead.
This
system is not always fully effective even with older, dye-based inks.
While this later scheme works well with some dye-based ink systems, in involves
wasting ink that would otherwise be used for printing.
Furthermore, cleaning systems using ink drawn from the printhead do not work as well, generally speaking, with high-solids waterfast ink formulations.
These factors, for example, limit the effectiveness of this known cleaning process, and this is undesirable.
Also, with this
system more ink residue collects on the wiper, and some of these accumulations can be pushed back into the nozzles of the printhead which can at least temporarily cause one or more nozzles not to fire properly, degrading print quality.
However, many problems associated with use of a treatment fluid have been identified.
Storage of the treatment fluid in adequate amounts for the life of the printer without leaking is problematic.
For example leaks can occur due to tipping the printer and pressure differentials due to a change in temperature or altitude during shipment.
Another problem recognized is application of treatment fluid to a printhead having undesirable accumulations of ink solids, dispersants, and other debris without
contamination of the source of treatment fluid by such accumulations.
Consistent optimal cleaning effectiveness as well as print quality can be compromised by application of too little or too much treatment fluid.
Too little treatment fluid results in less effective residue removal allowing undesirable accumulation.
Too much treatment fluid can result in one or more nozzles being at least temporarily disabled due to excess treatment fluid being pushed into the
nozzle by the wiper, or drawn into the
nozzle by negative pressure associated with operation.
In sum there are many problems, including identifying optimal ways of applying treatment fluid to enhance wiping effectiveness, that have been identified but not resolved in known cleaning systems.