Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

System for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer

A technology for prognosis and gastric cancer, applied in the field of new predictive prognosis system, can solve the problems of insufficient information used in treatment plan, inability to apply clinically, and genetic characteristics are unlikely to be reproduced, etc.

Active Publication Date: 2016-03-23
NOVOMICS CO LTD
View PDF7 Cites 7 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

However, most of the genetic traits that have been developed are unlikely to be reproduced, and insufficient information is available in selecting treatment options to be clinically applicable

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • System for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer
  • System for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer
  • System for predicting prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment 1

[0133] [Example 1] Investigation of the gene expression profile of NO patients with gastric cancer

[0134] Scatter filtering was performed sequentially by varying the filtering criteria, generating 15 clusters consisting of unique two main clusters. After scatter filtering, most genes have 701-5612 probes, which are diverse, and the p-values ​​based on scatter filtering criteria in the logrank test have various values, among which the maximum value is 0.291 (M2_1: by pair with at least A gene showing a 2-fold or more increase or decrease in probes when compared to the median was selected and scatter-filtered with a cluster of 5612 probes), while the minimum value was 0.0181 (M3_3: pairs with at least 3 Genes showing a 3-fold or more increase or decrease in probes when compared to the median were selected and had a cluster of 706 probes after scatter filtering). Of the 15 clusters, 11 of them yielded 2 major categories that exhibited statistically significant prognostic diffe...

Embodiment 2

[0140] [Example 2] The biological characteristics of two main clusters

[0141] To define the main gene identity of the two classifications showing this difference in prognostic outcome, t-tests were performed on 2 samples. 2886 significantly different probes (p<0.001 ) were generated by comparison between the 2 taxa showing two major clusters of M2_5 after unsupervised cluster analysis.

[0142] image 3 A shows a heat map of conditional cluster analysis using probes that were statistically significant (p<0.001) when compared between 2 classifications of M2_5 and showed 2-fold or more differences. The expression of many genes related to immune response (IFNG, GZMA, GZMB, CD8A, STAT1, JAK2, HLADPA1) was significantly increased in the good response group.

[0143] When GSEA analysis was performed on the above two classifications in the Biocarta pathway database, the most significantly improved pathways were Antigen Processing and presentation (MHC pathway) and IFN-r signaling...

Embodiment 3

[0148][Example 3] Formation of prognosis prediction model

[0149] In order to form a prognostic prediction model, 3 different prognostic prediction algorithms can be used, namely the mixed covariate prediction method (CCP), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and nearest centroid method (NC). To make predictions for taxonomic groups, significantly different genes were used for the two taxa at a significance level of 0.001, and calibrated prediction ratios were calculated by using leave-one-out cross-validation.

[0150] The difference in prognosis between the two predicted groups in the training set (YUSH dataset) relative to the M3_3 classification group was statistically significant (logrank test, CCP: p = 0.00933, LDA: p = 0.0137 and NC: p = 0.00217), and the calibrated prediction ratios for the M3_3 classification group ranged from 85% to 92% (CCP: 86%, LDA: 85% and NC: 92%) (Fig. 7A-C).

[0151] The MDACC dataset was used to examine the taxonomic groups. The prediction...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention relates to a novel system for predicting a prognosis capable of predicting the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer, and more specifically, capable of predicting a clinical result after a resection during gastric cancer surgery through gene set enrichment comparative analysis.

Description

technical field [0001] The present invention relates to a novel prognostic system capable of predicting the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer through comparative analysis of gene expression. Background technique [0002] Gastric adenocarcinoma (Gastricadeno-carcinoma) was the second leading cause of death among 700,349 deaths in 2000 and the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. Gastric adenocarcinoma is considered as a single heterogeneous disease with several epidemiological and histopathological features. Treatment of gastric cancer is mainly based on clinical parameters such as TNM (Tumor, Node, Metastasis) staging, which is used to decide whether it can be treated with surgery alone or with surgery and chemotherapy. Unlike breast cancer and colorectal cancer, gastric cancer can vary significantly from stage I to stage IV according to the TNM staging system. That is, the five-year survival rate of stage I is 90% or more, while that of stage IV ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(China)
IPC IPC(8): G01N33/574C12Q1/68G01N33/53G16B25/10
CPCC12Q1/6886C12Q2600/158G16B25/00C12Q2600/118G16B25/10C12Q1/6837G01N33/5308G01N33/57446C12Q2537/165
Inventor 许镛敏卢圣勳郑载镐徐振锡朴恩成
Owner NOVOMICS CO LTD
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products

Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.

© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com