Full-blind image quality evaluation method based on multi-dimensional visual feature cooperation under saliency modulation
A technology for image quality evaluation and visual features, which is applied in the field of image processing and can solve the problems of lack of fusion of subjective perception features of human eyes.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0043] A standard visual model construction method is disclosed in this embodiment, including the following steps:
[0044] Step a: Obtain multiple natural images, divide each natural image into image blocks to obtain multiple image blocks, and filter out image blocks that meet the sharpness threshold to obtain multiple high-sharpness image blocks;
[0045] Step b: For each high-sharpness image block obtained in step a, extract the natural scene statistical features in the spatial domain, the natural scene statistical features in the wavelet domain, the image structure features, the image color features and the image contrast features as image quality perception features, and obtain each The image quality perception features of each high-sharpness image block, and the image quality perception features of all high-sharpness image blocks are used as a feature vector matrix;
[0046] Step c: Fitting the eigenvector matrix obtained in step b with a multivariate Gaussian distributi...
Embodiment 2
[0108] In this embodiment, a blind image quality evaluation method based on multi-dimensional visual feature cooperation under saliency modulation is disclosed. On the basis of embodiment 1, the following technical features are also disclosed:
[0109] In step a, 125 high-quality natural images are selected, each image is divided into 96×96 image blocks, and M high-sharp image blocks are screened out.
[0110] In this embodiment, the three methods of NIQE, IL-NIQE, and IQA proposed by Zhang et al. are compared by experiments. The experimental results are shown in Table 1, where the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (SROCC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson Correlation Coefficient, PLCC) are the evaluation indexes of the experiment, and the value is [0,1]. The higher the value, the The better the performance of the method.
[0111] Table 1 Comparison results between different methods
[0112]
[0113] It can be seen from the results in Table 1 that the b...
PUM
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
- R&D Engineer
- R&D Manager
- IP Professional
- Industry Leading Data Capabilities
- Powerful AI technology
- Patent DNA Extraction
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic.
© 2024 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap