In some cases, the thermal or physical characteristics of quartz sand are unacceptable and foundries are obliged to use other sands with better properties.
The greater expense of the alternatives to quartz proscribes their general use, and foundries that make particularly demanding precision parts commonly use quartz sand or a recycled sand mixture containing an appreciable fraction of quartz sand for making the external parts of molds, and new non-quartz sand for making the internal parts or cores of the molds.
However, good
porosity requires low levels of fine particles, whilst smooth
casting surfaces require low levels of large particles; both of these factors limit the breadth of the
particle size distribution.
The combination of physical and chemical properties required of a quartz foundry sand limit the number of locations where such products occur naturally.
Sand may therefore need to be shipped over considerable distances, making quartz foundry sand considerably more expensive than local ordinary builder's sand.
Many countries, particularly those located in the drier parts of the world such as northern Africa and the middle East, lack indigenous sources of quartz suitable for use as foundry sand and must import foundry sand at considerable cost from northern and western Europe.
A further factor limiting the number of locations that can supply quartz foundry sand is that much quartz sand, e.g. beach sand, is contaminated with shell or bone fragments or limestone particles that seriously interfere with casting procedures.
Such interference is created by the fact that these contaminants may react with commonly used binders and / or decompose at the temperatures typically used to cast metals.
Not only does quartz present difficulties in availability, the use of quartz has been associated with respiratory ailments.
Hence, quartz sand is the subject of restrictions and precautions in the workplace, and the spent sand, particularly the dust from foundry filters which contains elevated levels of quartz dust, is similarly restricted.
This limits the useful employment of spent quartz sand in concrete and
asphalt.
Since different parts of the mold are at different temperatures during casting, they expand unevenly and cracks develop, into which
molten metal can penetrate.
After casting, these
metal intrusions appear as thin wafers that protrude from the casting and have to be removed in
time consuming finishing operations.
At worst, the cast part may need to be scrapped.
This phenomenon, known as “finning” is the most common cause of
scrap in
metal casting.
Like quartz, the currently available alternatives to quartz are also environmentally suspect.
Zircon is weakly radioactive, requiring workplace precautions and dump site limitations.
The sources of currently used alternatives to quartz sand are far fewer in number and most are located outside of the areas where there are large numbers of foundries; this means that they bear considerable freight cost penalties compared to quartz sand.
These factors make these alternative sands as much as ten or twenty times more expensive than quartz sand and they are therefore rarely used as the sole sand in a foundry.
Because spent foundry sand can contain organic materials, acids and
heavy metals, environmental authorities usually insist that it must be dumped at an approved site for
toxic waste; this adds considerably to the foundry's total sand related costs.
Such thermal processes remove organic binder residues by
incineration; they yield sand of fair quality but are energy intensive, costly and not suitable for all sand / binder combinations.
They also lead to emissions of environmentally undesirable gases (oxides of sulphur,
nitrogen and carbon).
Such
mechanical processes are less costly but the quality of the recovered sand is inferior and its use within the foundry often more restricted than that of new or thermally reclaimed sands.
Recovery of used sand is significantly complicated by the fact that different sand types are sometimes used for the molds and cores.
Once the casting process is complete, it is rarely feasible to separate the used molds and cores from one another, so the different sands used for these two purposes become mixed.
State of the art recycling methods are unable to satisfactorily separate this mixture into its component parts and foundries that use both costly non-quartz sand and cheaper quartz sand must therefore replenish their non-quartz sand with new material after each casting cycle.
In other cases, foundries that would prefer to use and recycle two grades of the same sand, e.g., one for making the mold and another of different
particle size distribution for making the core, are unable to do so because limitations in state of the art recycling methods do not allow such closely similar materials to be easily separated.
The proportion of sand that can be recycled can also be limited by the binder
system used, since some binders react with quartz at casting temperatures; these include some of the most commonly used binders that contain highly alkaline materials such as
sodium silicate or mixtures of phenolic resins with
caustic alkalis.
These binder resins are difficult to remove, either by attrition or
thermal treatment and, when heated during thermal recycle or subsequent casting, may react with the sand to form silicates of
low melting point that seriously compromise the
refractory characteristics of the sand.
Foundries are also limited in their choice of
classification methods for sand recycling and cannot economically employ methods originally used in large scale manufacture of foundry sand.
Wet classification has inordinately high operating costs and yields effluents that
pose environmental hazards.
Sieves are difficult and costly to use with fine materials and, unless the product fractions are carefully remixed, fail to yield products whose particle size distributions give optimal packing characteristics.