System and method for implementing group policy

a group policy and policy technology, applied in the field of computer systems and networks, can solve the problems of loss of productivity at the computer desktop of employees, too complex computer desktops, and inability to meet the needs of users,

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-07-27
MICROSOFT TECH LICENSING LLC
View PDF31 Cites 110 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

Lost productivity at employees' computer desktops is a major cost for corporations, often resulting from user errors such as modifying system configuration files in ways that render the computer unworkable.
Productivity is also lost when a computer desktop is too complex, such as when the desktop has too many non-essential applications and features thereon.
At the same time, much of the expense of administering distributed personal computer networks is spent at the desktop, performing tasks such as fixing the settings that the user has incorrectly or inadvertently modified.
However, there are a number of drawbacks present with existing policy systems.
One such drawback is that the policies are essentially static, whereby a user can change the settings and simply avoid the policy.
It is cost prohibitive to have an administrator or the like go from machine to machine to check the settings on a regular basis.
However such mandatory profiles are too inflexible, in that essentially all settings made by an individual user are lost whenever the user logs off.
For example, with mandatory profiles, customizations to a desktop, such as window placement, adding words to a user's spell checker and the like, which most enterprises would consider permissible and even desirable because they tend to increase an employee's efficiency, are lost when the user logs off.
Another significant drawback results from relying on a security group membership to determine the settings, particularly in that one group (the first group found for a user) determines that user's settings.
Present policy-determination systems, such as those basing policy on the domain plus membership in a security group, essentially follow a flat model, which does not fit well with a typical enterprise having a hierarchical organizational structure.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • System and method for implementing group policy
  • System and method for implementing group policy
  • System and method for implementing group policy

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

Exemplary Operating Environment

[0025]FIG. 1 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief general description of a suitable computing environment in which the invention may be implemented. Although not required, the invention will be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a personal computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures and the like that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing device...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

A method and system for implementing policy by accumulating policies for a policy recipient from policy objects associated with a hierarchically organized structure of containers, such as directory containers (sites, domains and organizational units) that includes the policy recipient. Based on administrator input, policy settings for the policy recipient may be accumulated into a specific order by inheriting policy from higher containers, which may enforce their policy settings over those of lower containers. Policy that is not enforced may be blocked at a container. The result is an accumulated set of group policy objects that are ordered by relative strength to resolve any policy conflicts. Policy may be applied to a policy recipient by calling extensions, such as an extension that layers the policy settings into the registry or an extension that uses policy information from the objects according to the ordering thereof. Linking of group policy objects to one or more containers (e.g., sites, domains and organizational units) is provided, as is exception management. The effects of group policy may be filtered based on users' or computers' membership in security groups.

Description

[0001] The present application is a continuation of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 254,155, filed Sep. 24, 2002, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 268,455, filed Mar. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,466,932, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 134,805 entitled “System and Method for Implementing Group Policy,” filed on Aug. 14, 1998, now abandoned; all of the related applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The invention relates generally to computer systems and networks, and more particularly to an improved method and system for implementing policy for users and computers. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] Lost productivity at employees' computer desktops is a major cost for corporations, often resulting from user errors such as modifying system configuration files in ways that render the computer unworkable. Productivity is also lost when a compu...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06F17/30G06F7/00G06F21/00H04L29/06
CPCG06F21/10G06F21/604G06F21/62G06Q10/10H04L63/102H04L63/104Y10S707/99939Y10S707/99953Y10S707/99933Y10S707/99945Y10S707/99942
Inventor DENNIS, MICHAEL W.FREED, MICHELE L.PLASTINA, DANIELFLO, ERIC R.KAYS, DAVID E. JR.CORRINGTON, ROBERT E.
Owner MICROSOFT TECH LICENSING LLC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products