Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

System and method for determining a presence state of a user

a technology of presence state and system, applied in the field of enhancing the productivity of users in communication networks, can solve problems such as conflict, production errors, and users being late for work and still in their vehicles

Inactive Publication Date: 2007-10-04
MOTOROLA INC
View PDF4 Cites 14 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0018] Rather than having content rules configured statically into the presence server, the presence source dynamically creates and pushes the rules to the watcher, where the rules are the processed. This is advantageous because: a) the source (not the presence server) is often the best suited for creating rules, since it alone knows the precise semantics of the information and the nature of the device publishing it, and b) the watcher (not the presence server) is often the best suited for processing the rules, because knowledge of the conflicts and rules provide the watcher with a richer picture of the presence state of the user.
[0020] Thus, approaches are described that more accurately determine the presence states of presence entities. These approaches are easy and cost effective to implement, and since they substantially reduce the number of inaccurate presence state determinations, the user experience with the system is enhanced.

Problems solved by technology

Unfortunately, these previous approaches often produced erroneous results.
However, the user might be late for work and still in their vehicle when the application at the personal computer published its information.
Since one set of presence information indicated that the user was at the office while the other information indicated that the user was in their vehicle, a conflict existed.
Unfortunately, this result was incorrect because the user was actually late for work and still in their vehicle.
Thus, in this example, communications destined for the user were erroneously directed to the office of the user and contact with the user could not be established.
As a consequence of the above-mentioned problems, user frustration with the system increased as communications were incorrectly routed and / or prohibited.
Since in many situations the problems occurred in a work environment, worker productivity was also adversely affected.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • System and method for determining a presence state of a user
  • System and method for determining a presence state of a user
  • System and method for determining a presence state of a user

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0014] A system and method determines the presence state of a presence entity (e.g., a human user or help desk) by receiving presence information and an associated composition rule from a single or from multiple presence sources. A presence compositor applies the composition rule to the information to resolve conflicts and obtain a single coherent presence state. Since the composition rule need not be fixed, but may change according to the reliability of the source of the information, more accurate presence state determinations can be made.

[0015] In many of these embodiments, presence information associated with a presence entity (e.g., human user) is received, for example, at a presence service (e.g., presence server) which stores and distributes the information to authorized watchers who request presence information about the user. The presence information may indicate a characteristic of a user such as the user's availability to receive communication, the user's activity, the ge...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

Presence information associated with a presence entity (102) is received. A composition rule associated with the presence information is also received. The composition rule is applied to the presence information in order to determine a presence state for the presence entity (102).

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION [0001] This application is a division of parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 242,457 by inventor Kelley, filed on Oct. 3, 2005, and assigned to the assignee of the present application, and is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference thereto.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The field of the invention relates to enhancing the productivity of users in communication networks. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] Watchers in presence-enabled networks typically examine the presence state of presence entities (e.g., human users or help desks) operating within these networks in order to determine whether these presence entities are available or unavailable to receive communications. The presence state is typically transmitted to the watcher device by a presence service and, based upon this state, contact with the presence entity may be either encouraged or discouraged. [0004] In some situations, information relating to the presenc...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): G06F15/16
CPCH04L67/24G06Q10/107H04L67/54
Inventor KELLEY, SEAN S.HARRIS, JOHN M.
Owner MOTOROLA INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products