However, this method has various disadvantages.
In the first place, this method is extremely complicated and entails several handling steps.
For many patients, particularly
older people and children, these handling steps can often be carried out only with difficulty since the patients are restricted, for example, in terms of their
motor ability and their
visual acuity.
Furthermore, these method steps can be carried out discretely only in a few cases, which means, for example, that the patient's privacy is protected only to an inadequate extent when carrying out a measurement at the workplace.
Moreover, incorrect operation of the measurement method can easily lead to false measured values, in some cases with fatal consequences resulting from incorrect medication based on the measurement results.
However, because of the different
diameter of these coaxial electrodes, these individual
electrode surfaces differ in terms of their properties and are limited in number.
Although the coaxial design is described in US 2007 / 0027384 A1 as being particularly insensitive with respect to bending, in contrast to planar sensor constructions, the
solid structure in itself entails a high degree of stiffness of the sensors, and bending may even alter the
active electrode surface areas and thus greatly influence the measured values.
This structure has the
disadvantage that the exact position of the individual electrodes may be undefined, since the spiral-shaped electrodes can move along a longitudinal axis of the sensors.
Moreover, the number of the electrodes thus configured is limited, which has the result, for example, that an averaging of the measured values obtained from several electrodes can be done only with difficulty using this structure.
Overall, the implantable sensors known from the prior art are extremely complicated as regards their structure and their production.
If it is assumed that these sensors are disposable sensors that can only be used for a short time (typically for about one week), then it is clear that the methods used in the sensors known from the prior art do not satisfy the requirements made of disposable articles.
However, such methods are not compatible with the production of cost-effective disposable articles.
In view of the small size of these electrodes, lithographic methods are likewise required for these, which again drives up the costs for producing such sensors.
The construction known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,299,571 is also technically complicated since, in addition to a tube with two inner lumens having to be produced, it is also necessary for a conventional sensor element, but one with miniaturized dimensions, to be inserted into one of these inner lumens.
Moreover, lithographic methods, in particular the
etching of
metal layers that is associated with these methods, are not always as reliable as is necessary for the production of medical products.
In particular, it can happen that individual electrodes are still connected to one another by “bridges”, such that the functionality of the sensors can easily be impaired or even completely prevented on account of production problems.