Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Methods for performing differential capture proteomics

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-05-11
DIFFERENTIAL PROTEOMICS
View PDF6 Cites 4 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0021] The present invention provides various improvements to the DCP methodology. In particular, the present invention features methods for increasing the efficiency of the detection of biomolecules, e.g., proteins. For example, the DCP process may include the step of derivatization of protein species present in a biological sample, thereby modifying functional groups on the biomolecules in order to facilitate immobilization onto a support, followed by exposing the immobilized biomolecules from the sample to a library, such as a phage display library. This derivatization step is controlled by varying, for example, the derivatizing agent, the concentrations of reactants, the temperature, and time for derivatization. The matrices of the invention can be prepared by covalently linking biomolecules in a biological sample to a support. The samples are preferably treated with chemical agents to denature the biomolecules, e.g., proteins, prior to being adhered to the support. The immobilization step, which may be performed either before or after phage binding, can also be controlled by adjusting the concentration of reactants, temperature, and time for immobilization. Capture events between biomolecules, e.g., proteins, and binding species, e.g., phage (when a phage display library is used in the DCP process), can likewise be controlled via manipulation of similar parameters.

Problems solved by technology

Unfortunately, selecting molecules of interest from large ensembles or repertoires can be time-consuming and costly, and often only provides leads which require further investigation and development.
Unfortunately, present methods of analyzing biomolecules are time-consuming and expensive, and suffer from inefficiencies in detection, imaging, purification, and analysis.
Although the genomics approach has advanced our understanding of the genetic basis of biological processes, it has significant limitations.
However, the proteomics approach faces numerous obstacles, including sample complexity, large relative abundance range, and quantification of proteins.
Technical constraints have heretofore impeded the rapid, cost-effective, reproducible, and systematic analysis of proteins and other biomolecules present in biological samples.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Methods for performing differential capture proteomics
  • Methods for performing differential capture proteomics
  • Methods for performing differential capture proteomics

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example

Step I. Proteins Capture Phage Against Proteins Differing Between Samples

[0086] (a) Preparation of Protein Affinity Matrices for Two Samples (FIG. 1).

[0087] Sample Collection. Samples of human CSF are collected from two different individuals by lumbar puncture in a sterile container. The samples should immediately be placed in an ice bath and brought to the laboratory for analysis. On arrival in the laboratory, the CSF samples should be centrifuged to remove circulating cells at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at 5° C. The samples can be either processed immediately or stored at −7° C. until analysis (Sanchez, J. C. and Hochstrasser, D. F., “Proteome Analysis Protocols” in Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 112, Humana Press, Totowa, N.J. (1999)).

[0088] Sample Preparation. To dissociate bound proteins and other species, and to minimize protein interactions, aliquots of the samples (100 μl) are made up to a final concentration of 3M guanidine HCl and 0.2M formic acid, and incubated in ice...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

Disclosed herein are improved methods for identifying, isolating, and comparing proteins and other biomolecules differing between two biological samples using affinity chromatography and phage display techniques.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] The invention relates to methods for identifying and isolating proteins and other biological molecules using affinity chromatography and phage display techniques. [0002] There is an increasing need, particularly in the fields of medicine and agriculture, to identify and characterize the molecules which participate in a wide variety of biological processes and to find new molecules capable of modulating these processes. One way to search for novel bioactive compounds is to screen libraries of natural materials or synthesized molecules, using assay techniques which can range in complexity from simple binding reactions to elaborate physiological preparations. Unfortunately, selecting molecules of interest from large ensembles or repertoires can be time-consuming and costly, and often only provides leads which require further investigation and development. [0003] Recently, there have been several developments both in the generation of libraries and in ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): G01N33/543C40B30/04G01N33/68
CPCC40B30/04G01N33/6842
Inventor STROOBANT, PAULMCBURNEY, ROBERT
Owner DIFFERENTIAL PROTEOMICS