Devices and methods for repairing soft tissue

Abstract

Devices and methods are disclosed for securing soft tissue to bone, and particularly for axially anchoring suture which attaches the soft tissue to adjacent bone structure.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED CASE [0001] This application is a continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10 / 299,171 to Seth Foerester, et al. filed Nov. 19, 2002, the subject matter being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The present invention relates to devices and methods for repairing soft tissue, and more particularly to devices and methods for arthroscopic repair of a torn rotator cuff. [0003] It is an increasingly common problem for tendons and other soft, connective tissues to tear or to detach from associated bone. One such type of tear or detachment is a “rotator cuff” tear, wherein the supraspinatus tendon separates from the humerus, causing pain and loss of ability to elevate and externally rotate the arm. Complete separation can occur if the shoulder is subjected to gross trauma, but typically, the tear begins as a small lesion, especially in older patients. [0004] To repair a torn rotator cuff...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The invention is about new ways to secure soft tissue to bone, particularly for anchoring sutures. The patent describes several devices that use compressible plugs, plates, springs, or other mechanisms to secure the suture to the bone. These devices can be used to anchor sutures in a variety of ways, including by compressing a plug or pulling a length of suture through a channel in the bone. The invention provides new and improved methods for securing soft tissue to bone, which can be useful in various medical procedures.

Problems solved by technology

It is an increasingly common problem for tendons and other soft, connective tissues to tear or to detach from associated bone.

One such type of tear or detachment is a “rotator cuff” tear, wherein the supraspinatus tendon separates from the humerus, causing pain and loss of ability to elevate and externally rotate the arm.

Because of this maneuver, the deltoid requires postoperative protection, thus retarding rehabilitation and possibly resulting in residual weakness.

Although the above described surgical techniques are the current standard of care for rotator cuff repair, they are associated with a great deal of patient discomfort and a lengthy recovery time, ranging from at least four months to one year or more.

It is the above described manipulation of the deltoid muscle together with the large skin incision that causes the majority of patient discomfort and an increased recovery time.

Unfortunately, the skill level required to facilitate an entirely arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is inordinately high.

Intracorporeal suturing is clumsy and time consuming, and only the simplest stitch patterns can be utilized.

Extracorporeal knot tying is somewhat less difficult, but the tightness of the knots is difficult to judge, and the tension cannot later be adjusted.

So, knots tied arthroscopically are difficult to achieve, impossible to adjust, and are located in less than optimal areas of the shoulder.

Suture tension is also impossible to measure and adjust once the knot has been fixed.

Consequently, because of the technical difficulty of the procedure, presently less than 1% of all rotator cuff procedures is of the arthroscopic type, and is considered investigational in nature.

Another significant difficulty with current arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques is shortcomings related to currently available suture anchors.

Suture eyelets in bone anchors available today, which like the eye of a needle are threaded with the thread or suture, are small in radius, and can cause the suture to fail at the eyelet when the anchor is placed under high tensile loads.

Screws are known for creating such attachments, but existing designs suffer from a number of disadvantages, including their tendency to loosen over time, requiring a second procedure to later remove them, and their requirement for a relatively flat attachment geometry.

These anchors still suffer from the aforementioned problem of eyelet design that stresses the sutures.

Other methods of securing soft tissue to bone are known in the prior art, but are not presently considered to be feasible for shoulder repair procedures, because of physicians' reluctance to leave anything but a suture in the capsule area of the shoulder.

The reason for this is that staples, tacks, and the like could possibly fall out and cause injury during movement.

Also, the tacks or staples require a substantial hole in the soft tissue, and make it difficult for the surgeon to precisely locate the soft tissue relative to the bone.

Images