Apparatus and method for simulation of combustion effects in a fireplace

Abstract

The present invention produces a combustion simulation of flames, burning logs and embers in a fuel-burning fireplace or like device. One or more light source(s), such as LEDs, are used to transmit light to and through one or more of an artificial log set and an ember bed. A microprocessor-based controller is used to vary one or more of light intensity and color of the LEDs to simulate a naturally varying glow effect of the ember bed and the log set.

Description

[0001] This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60 / 700,755, filed Jul. 19, 2005.FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The present invention relates generally to electric fireplace technology. In particular, the present invention relates to an apparatus and methods that provide improved simulation of combustion effects in a fireplace through illumination. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] Fireplaces are desirable features in the home. Traditional wood or other solid fuel burning fireplaces have, however, gradually become replaced by devices that burn non-solid materials, such as gas, or that produce heat electrically. The combustion of gas does provide real flames and heat. However, depending on the geographical region in which the fireplace is used, gas may be an expensive source of energy. Gas combustion also requires a working flue to vent the combustion products. [0004] Electric or electronic fireplaces are a clean and easy source of heat. Electric fireplaces ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0015] An additional embodiment includes a screen or privacy glass panel, made of material that has a property of changing the opacity according to the electric current applied to it. The privacy glass panel has a high degree of transparency when electrical current is applied. A controller applies electrical current to the privacy glass when the fireplace is turned off. This allows the user to see through this glass and have the visual perception of the logs and ember bed when the fireplace is off. The privacy glass is cloudy or hazy when no electrical current is applied. A controller prevents the flow of electrical current to the privacy glass when the fireplace is turned on. The privacy glass can be positioned anywhere inside the fireplace—such as inside the ember-bed or imitation logs—because it is nearly invisible to the user when the fireplace unit is off.

[0016] More specifically, the privacy glass may be made from clear or tinted glass or a glass-like polymeric-based material, such as polycarbonates, through the use of which image of flickering flames is produced that is well defined and realistic. The material used for the privacy glass can be free-forming so that the glass can be manipulated into any shape desired. For example, forming the privacy glass to a three-dimensional shape can create the look of a flame that would appear to be coming from different planes within the ember-bed and / or logs, greatly improving the realism of the fire effect in the electric fireplaces.

Problems solved by technology

However, depending on the geographical region in which the fireplace is used, gas may be an expensive source of energy.

However, electric fireplaces do not have the same combustion effects that are produced by fuel burning fireplaces.

In general, these efforts have produced devices that are complex, multi-component arrangements that are time-consuming and expensive to manufacture.

Also, the flame, burning logs and ember bed effect simulated by the devices has been generally limited in scope.

With time, consumers find the simulation unconvincing representations of actual combustion effects.

Drawbacks include unrealistic flame appearance and repetition of the flame simulation over a short period of time.

An additional disadvantage is that the effect relies on the use of a motor to rotate the light randomizer.

Also, the life of a standard light bulb is short and therefore must be frequently replaced.

This approach is complicated since it is highly dependent upon accurate placement of many reflecting surfaces.

An additional drawback of this method is that the embers glow unrealistically since real glowing embers tend to pulse in color and intensity—from low to high intensity and back—depending on the air flow around them.

Images