Check patentability & draft patents in minutes with Patsnap Eureka AI!

Method and apparatus for the mitigation of explosively formed projectiles

a technology mitigation methods, applied in the field of armor, can solve the problems of wreaking havoc, many casualties, and tremendous loss of strategic assets, and achieve the effect of reducing the effects of explosively formed projectiles

Inactive Publication Date: 2012-06-28
DEAN JASON A
View PDF0 Cites 2 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0019]According to another aspect, the invention relates to a method of mitigating the effects of an explosively formed projectile. The method comprises the steps of splitting a mass of an explosively formed projectile into a plurality of secondary projectiles having a respective smaller mass than the mass of the explosively formed projectile; cooling at least one of the plurality of secondary projectiles to a temperature below a temperature of the explosively formed projectile; and slowing at least one of the plurality of secondary projectiles to a velocity below a hydrodynamic termination velocity; thereby mitigating the effects of the explosively formed projectile on an object against which the explosively formed projectile is launched.

Problems solved by technology

This new weapon has wreaked havoc on coalition armor and has resulted in many casualties and tremendous loss of strategic assets.
The penetrator mass then passes through the opening so created and can do significant damage to anything that it then contacts.
Conventional armor systems are unable to handle the extreme forces generated from a hypervelocity impact caused by a molten or semi-molten copper slug.
Although such armor is effective in providing protection from small arms fire and indirect shrapnel, it is ineffective in preventing an armor breach by an EFP slug.
Although these systems are hardened, they still fall short of providing full protection from EFP slugs and can cost as much as $2,000 per square foot.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method and apparatus for the mitigation of explosively formed projectiles
  • Method and apparatus for the mitigation of explosively formed projectiles
  • Method and apparatus for the mitigation of explosively formed projectiles

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0036]We describe a three step approach for mitigating the effects of an EFP device which is called the “SCS” system and method. The acronym “SCS” stands for “split”, “cool”, and “slow,” which describes how the explosively formed projectile is treated. This three step approach offers a unique method for mitigating the effects of an EFP by weakening or reducing the effect of the penetrator by reducing its mass, its temperature, and its velocity. Although there are three primary steps to mitigation, there exists no set value for the number of layers that compose the 3 steps. It is advantageous to manipulate both the number of individual layers as well as their perspective positions in different combinations. These modifications each have as their effects remain the same, namely to split a penetrator to reduce the mass of individual portions relative to the original mass and to increase the surface to volume ratio of the individual portions relative to the original mass, to cool the in...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A multi step approach to mitigating the effects of explosively formed projectiles (EFPs). The first step involves a splitting step whereby the EFP total mass is reduced into fragments having smaller masses. The fragments are then exposed to cascading armored disks in preparation for a temperature reduction or “cooling” step. Heat is reduced by conduction through a cooling medium. Temperature reduction restores some solid properties to each fragment. The EFP fragments are slowed by exposure to a series of cascading armored disks designed to disperse contact pressures from any remaining fragments.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application claims priority to and the benefit of co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61 / 340,281 filed Mar. 15, 2010, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The invention relates to armor in general and particularly to an armor composition that provides protection against explosively formed projectiles.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]Recent conflicts in the Middle East and the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have demonstrated the devastating tactics used in modern day asymmetrical warfare. Unconventional methods such as IEDs are the choice of the insurgents as they provide a low cost easily constructed strategic weapon of influence within the region. The explosively formed projectile (EFP, also referred to as explosively formed penetrators) is a new deadly form of IED has made its way to the battlefield. This new weapon has wreaked havoc on coa...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
IPC IPC(8): F41H5/04
CPCF41H5/007F41H5/0492F41H5/0442F41H5/0414
Inventor DEAN, JASON A.
Owner DEAN JASON A
Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More