Profiled frame element

Abstract

A profiled frame element to be mounted on a longitudinal profiled element (L) having at least one groove (3). The profiled frame element (R, R1) has a bottom support (1) and a guiding projection (2). At least one channel (4) is provided which is suitable for accommodating different wall thicknesses.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]The invention relates to a frame profile for attachment to a longitudinal profile and to a cladding profile.[0002]The prior art has disclosed longitudinal profiles with grooves which are used as corner pillars of exhibition walls. For this purpose, the exhibition walls are inserted into the groove. The exhibition walls thus realized however generally do not offer adequate insulation action, or entail disproportionately high outlay. In general, use is made of simple plastics panels or textile walls which are connected directly to the corner pillars. The so-called corner pillars will be referred to as longitudinal profiles throughout the remainder of the patent application. The prior art has disclosed a combination of textile and solid walls, in particular of different wall depths.[0003]A disadvantage of the prior art is that the erection and dismantling of exhibition walls is relatively expensive, and the scope for the use of creative possibilities is...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The invention provides a frame profile that can be attached to a longitudinal profile, allowing for the creation of walls that extend beyond the width of the longitudinal profile. The frame profile can be made from metal or plastic and can be attached to the longitudinal profile using a detachable connection. The frame profile has a main member and a guide lug that interacts with a groove in the longitudinal profile. The guide lug has an offset, allowing for different wall depths to be accommodated. The technical effect of the invention is the creation of a versatile and flexible frame profile that can be easily attached to a longitudinal profile for the creation of walls in various situations.

Problems solved by technology

The exhibition walls thus realized however generally do not offer adequate insulation action, or entail disproportionately high outlay.

A disadvantage of the prior art is that the erection and dismantling of exhibition walls is relatively expensive, and the scope for the use of creative possibilities is severely limited.

A further disadvantage of the prior art is that the erection and dismantling of walls in room-in-room systems is cumbersome and relatively expensive, and furthermore, meaningful scope for creative variety is severely limited.

Furthermore, the devices known from the prior art meet the modern demands only to a certain extent.

Furthermore, the devices known from the prior art likewise do not meet modern demands with regard to design.

Images