A Source Sludge Reduction Process of Return Sludge Alkali Treatment-Acidification
A technology of backflow sludge and alkali treatment, applied in sludge treatment, biological sludge treatment, water/sludge/sewage treatment, etc. low consumption effect
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0019] Using domestic sewage from a community, the raw water quality is as follows: COD150-450mg / L, NH4 + -N25-55mg / L, TN28-62mg / L, TP4-12mg / L, pH6.8-7.7. The hydraulic retention time of anaerobic pond, anoxic pond and aerobic pond are 2h, 2h and 8h respectively, and the dissolved oxygen is 0.1-0.2mg / L, 0.4-0.5mg / L and 1.5-2.5mg / L respectively, The sludge concentration in the aerobic tank is maintained at 2.5-3.5g / L, the internal reflux ratio is 200%, and the room temperature is 18-26°C. Under the same test conditions, two sets of systems were operated, one of which added sludge alkali treatment-acidification process (test system) in the sludge return section, the ratio of direct return sludge to alkali-treated sludge was 1:4, and the sludge The reflux ratio of mud is 100%; while another set does not increase the process (control system), the reflux ratio of sludge is also 100%. In the test system, 10M NaOH is used for the lye, the flow rate ratio of the lye and the concentr...
Embodiment 2
[0021] The test conditions are the same as in Example 1. The lye is 10MNaOH. In the test system, the flow rate ratio of lye and concentrated sludge is selected as 1:2000. The pH of the sludge entering the acidification tank is about 11.0. The residence time of the sludge in the acidification tank is 12h. The pH reaches 9. The test ran normally for 2 months. The test results show that compared with the control system, the average COD of the effluent of the test system is 41mg / L, which is 3.5mg / L higher than that of the control system, and the NH 4 + The removal rate of -N and TN was 2-5% lower than that of the control system, while the removal rate of TP was 40% lower, and the reduction of residual sludge was about 54%.
Embodiment 3
[0023] The test conditions are the same as in Example 1. The experimental conditions were the same as in Example 1. The lye is 10M NaOH, the ratio of the flow rate of lye and concentrated sludge in the test system is selected as 1:4000, the pH of the sludge entering the acidification tank is about 11.0, the residence time of the sludge in the acidification tank is 10h, and the final pH of the sludge value reaches 7. The test ran normally for 2 months. The test results show that compared with the control system, the average COD of the effluent of the test system is 39mg / L, which is 2mg / L higher than that of the control system, and the NH 4 + The removal rate of -N and TN was 1-2% lower than that of the control system, while the removal rate of TP was 25% lower, and the reduction of residual sludge was about 25%.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 