Method for evaluating quality of proteomics mass spectrum data
A technology of mass spectrometry data and proteomics, which is applied in the field of evaluating the quality of proteomics mass spectrometry data, can solve the problems of not being able to display the influencing factors of mass spectrometry data, time-consuming and labor-intensive analysis of mass spectrometry identification, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1
[0075]The data comes from the article "Performance Evaluation of the Q Exactive HF X for Shotgun Proteomics" published in the "Journal of Proteome Research" in 2018. Example 1 uses the resolution set by the author of this article to be 15000, and the mass spectrometer QEHFX is used to analyze The resulting dataset for sample identification. First, the user loads the mass spectrum data, and extracts and calculates the actual data of the item corresponding to the required secondary scoring result. According to the scoring rules and actual data shown in Table 1, each secondary scoring result can be calculated. As shown in Table 2, 1.1 Peptide identification results, in the user data, 43052.81 peptides were identified per hour by mass spectrometry, and the linear scoring standard for item 1.1 is 5 points for mass spectrometry identification of more than 35,000 peptides per hour. 1 point for identifying less than 10,000 peptides. Obviously, the number of peptide identifications i...
Embodiment 2
[0081] The two datasets used in this embodiment are from the article "Performance Evaluation of the Q Exactive HF X for ShotgunProteomics" published in the "Journal of ProteomeResearch" in 2018. Dataset 1 is the dataset used in Example 1. Dataset 2 is the data set obtained by identifying the samples with the mass spectrometer QEHF (data set 1 is QEHFX) with the resolution set to 15000 by the author of this paper. Similarly, the two data sets were evaluated by the same method as in Example 1, and the inventors made a comparative analysis of the evaluation results.
[0082] First, if Figure 6 Shown: the data set 2 represented by the dotted line, the number of identified peptides is much higher than that of the data set 1 represented by the solid line, it can be seen that the quality of the mass spectrometry data of the data set 2 is higher than that of the data set episode 1.
[0083] In terms of the number of secondary spectrum acquisitions, data set 1 is much higher than da...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


