Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Preparation of components for refinery blending of transportation fuels

a technology for transportation fuels and components, applied in the direction of fuels, metal/metal-oxide/metal-hydroxide catalysts, physical/chemical process catalysts, etc., can solve the problems of reducing the reducing the efficiency of transportation fuels, and reducing the sulfur content of fuels. , to achieve the effect of reducing the sulfur and/or nitrogen conten

Inactive Publication Date: 2008-07-24
BP CORP NORTH AMERICA INC
View PDF2 Cites 2 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

Modern high performance diesel engines demand ever more advanced specification of fuel compositions, but cost remains an important consideration.
Sulfur containing organic compounds in fuels continues to be a major source of environmental pollution.
Even in newer, high performance diesel engines combustion of conventional fuel produces smoke in the exhaust.
However, most such compounds have high vapor pressure and / or are nearly insoluble in diesel fuel, and they have poor ignition quality, as indicated by their cetane numbers.
Diesel fuels of low lubricity may cause excessive wear of fuel pumps, injectors and other moving parts which come in contact with the fuel under high pressures.
Thus refiners are faced with the challenge of reducing the sulfur levels in fuels and in particular diesel fuel within the timeframes prescribed by the regulatory authorities.
First, the conventional three way catalyst (TWC) catalyst is ineffective in removing NOx emissions from diesel engines, and second, the need for particulate control is significantly higher than with the gasoline engine.
Several exhaust treatment technologies are emerging for control of diesel engine emissions, and in all sectors the level of sulfur in the fuel affects efficiency of the technology.
Furthermore, in the context of catalytic control of diesel emissions, high fuel sulfur also creates a secondary problem of particulate emission, due to catalytic oxidation of sulfur and reaction with water to form a sulfate mist.
The combustion process leaves tiny particles of carbon behind and leads to significantly higher particulate emissions than are present in gasoline engines.
However, significant quantities of unburned hydrocarbon are adsorbed on the carbon particulate.
While an increase in combustion temperature can reduce particulate, this leads to an increase in NOx emission by the well-known Zeldovitch mechanism.
Furthermore, NOx trap systems are extremely sensitive to fuel sulfur and available evidence suggests that they would need sulfur levels below 10 ppm to remain active.
Conventional hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts can be used to remove a major portion of the sulfur from petroleum distillates for the blending of refinery transportation fuels, but they are not efficient for removing sulfur from compounds where the sulfur atom is sterically hindered as in multi-ring aromatic sulfur compounds.
Using conventional hydrodesulfurization catalysts at high temperatures would cause yield loss, faster catalyst coking, and product quality deterioration (e.g., color).
Using high pressure requires a large capital outlay.
Such methods have proven to be of only limited utility since only a rather low degree of desulfurization is achieved.
In addition, substantial loss of valuable products may result due to cracking and / or coke formation during the practice of these methods.
However, the naphthenic peroxides formed are deleterious gum initiators.
These latter compounds are toxic and carcinogenic.
However, to obtain this low sulfur level only about 85 percent of the distillate feedstream is recovered as a low sulfur distillate fuel product.
Therefore it is not prudent to extract an inordinate amount of the aromatics.
The use of sulfuric acid as an oxidizing acid is problematic in that corrosion is a concern when water is present and hydrocarbons can be sulfonated when a little water is present.
Formic acid is relatively more expensive than acetic acid.
These expensive alloys would have to be used in the solvent recovery section and storage vessels.
It is believed this undesirable phase can be formed due to the poor lipophilicity of formic acid.
Therefore at lower temperatures, formic acid cannot maintain in solution some of the extracted sulfones.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Preparation of components for refinery blending of transportation fuels
  • Preparation of components for refinery blending of transportation fuels

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0076]Table II below shows the results of carrying out the process of the present invention using a catalyst containing 8 wt. % Co based on the total catalyst weight, supported on MgO. The process was carried out in a batch reactor at 200 psig, 900 rpm and 310° F. The reactor used was a stirred, heated, 1 liter volume autoclave available from Autoclave Engineers having internal cooling coils and a means for continuous gas feed. The oxygen-containing gas having an oxygen content of 7 vol. % was added at a flow rate of 1200 standard cubic centimeters per minute. The reaction time was 5 hours. The distillate feed had the composition set out in Table I below. The batch reactor contained 300 grams of distillate feed and 9 grams of catalyst.

[0077]FIG. I plots the retention times in minutes for the sulfur-containing species signals in millivolts for a feedstock and an oxidation zone effluent stream shown in Table II, with the latter plotted below the feedstock. The longer retention times i...

example 2

[0079]Table III below shows the efficacy of the invention to reduce nitrogen content in addition to sulfur content when carried out with a feed as described in Table I. The runs were carried out in the same equipment described in Example I except the oxidation reaction conditions where as otherwise set forth in Table III. The oxidation reaction zone effluent was then extracted 3 times using an 85% acetic acid solvent wherein the effluent to solvent volume ratio was 2:1. The extractions were subsequently followed by 2 water washes.

TABLE IIIOxydesulfurizationCatalystReaction conditions8% Co / MgO8% Co / MgOTemperature, ° F.310265Pressure, psig2002007% oxygen gas flow rate, sccm400400Rxn time, hr51stir speed, rpm9001400Oxidized diesel sulfur, ppm-w2325Oxidized diesel oxygen, wt %2.010.16Oxidized diesel TAN, mg KOH / g1.380.10Oxidized diesel nitrogen, ppm-w1111acid-washed oxidized diesel sulfur, ppm-w32acid-washed oxidized diesel nitrogen, ppm-w5NA**Not Analyzed

example 3

[0080]Tables IV and V below show results of carrying out the process of the present invention using a fixed bed reactor.

TABLE IVOxydesulfurization RunCatalyst8%8%8%8%Co / MgOCo / MgOCo / MgOCo / MgODiesel feed sulfur, ppm25252525Reaction conditionsTemperature, ° F.120150201294Pressure, psig2262182202267% oxygen gas flow rate, sccm250250250250Run time, hr17416589liquid hourly space velocity0.50.50.50.5Oxidized diesel sulfur, ppm-w26222420Oxidized diesel oxygen, wt. %0.120.090.090.34Oxidized diesel TAN, mg KOH / g0.040.040.030.14liquid product wt, g139.02148.47136.98150.31liquid product mass balance, wt. %96.50103.0695.09104.34acid-washed oxidized diesel sulfur, ppm-w2521203Final diesel recovery, wt, %80.6783.1383.1384.60

TABLE VOxydesulfurization RunCatalyst8%8%8%8%Co / MgOCo / MgOCo / MgOCo / MgODiesel feed sulfur, ppm25252525Reaction conditionsTemperature, ° F.226251277303Pressure, psig2102042042047% oxygen gas flow rate, sccm250250250250Run time, hr17416589liquid hourly space velocity1111Oxidized di...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

PropertyMeasurementUnit
atomic numberaaaaaaaaaa
weight percentaaaaaaaaaa
temperaturesaaaaaaaaaa
Login to View More

Abstract

Disclosed is a process to make environment friendly components for refinery blending of transportation fuels. The process involves contacting a petroleum distillate with an oxygen-containing gas at oxidation conditions in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst comprising a Group VII metal on a basic support to oxidize any sulfur and / or nitrogen-containing compounds in the distillate. A portion of these sulfur and / or nitrogen-containing compounds is then removed from the oxidation zone effluent.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]It is well known that internal combustion engines have revolutionized transportation following their invention during the last decades of the 19th century. While others, including Benz and Gottleib Wilhelm Daimler, invented and developed engines using electric ignition of fuel such as gasoline, Rudolf C. K. Diesel invented and built the engine named for him which employs compression for auto-ignition of the fuel in order to utilize low-cost organic fuels. Development of improved diesel engines for use in transportation has preceded hand-in-hand with improvements in diesel fuel compositions. Modern high performance diesel engines demand ever more advanced specification of fuel compositions, but cost remains an important consideration.[0002]At the present time most fuels for transportation are derived from natural petroleum. Indeed, petroleum as yet is the world's main source of hydrocarbons used as fuel and petrochemical feedstock. While compositions ...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C10L1/14B01J21/10B01J23/75C10G27/04C10G27/10C10G45/02C10G53/14
CPCB01J21/10B01J23/75C10G53/14C10G27/10C10G45/02C10G27/04
Inventor KETLEY, GRAHAM W.YEDINAK, JANET L.HODGES, MICHAELHUFF, GEORGE A.
Owner BP CORP NORTH AMERICA INC