Clean Viscosified Treatment Fluids and Associated Methods

a treatment fluid and viscosification technology, applied in the field of subterranean fluids, can solve the problems of reducing the rate at which the fluid is allowed to penetrate or leak off into desirable locations within the subterranean formation, affecting the rheology of the treatment fluid, and affecting the proportion of the fracturing fluid lost during the fracturing operation. , to achieve the effect of reducing the loss of fluid

Inactive Publication Date: 2011-09-08
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
View PDF31 Cites 20 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0009]In yet another embodiment, the methods of the present invention comprise: providing a treatment fluid comprising an aqueous base fluid, a viscosifying agent, and a compliant dual-functional additive that comprises a fluid loss control agent and a breaker; introducing the treatment fluid into at least a portion of the subterranean formation; and allowing the dual-functional additive to minimize fluid loss by obstructing at least one pore throat opening in the subterranean formation.

Problems solved by technology

In certain circumstances, a portion of the fracturing fluid may be lost during the fracturing operation, e.g., through undesirable leakoff into natural fractures present in the formation.
Many conventional fluid loss control additives permanently reduce the permeability of a subterranean formation, negatively affect the rheology of the treatment fluid in which they are used, and / or reduce the rate at which the fluid is allowed to penetrate or leak off into desirable locations within the subterranean formation.
Thus, costly and time-consuming operations may be required to reverse the effects of conventional fluid loss control additives on the treatment fluid and / or to restore permeability to those portions of the subterranean formation affected by the fluid loss control additives.
Gels that break prematurely can lead to a premature reduction in the fluid viscosity, resulting in a less than desirable fracture width in the formation causing excessive injection pressures and premature termination of the treatment.
On the other hand, gelled fluids that break too slowly can cause slow recovery of the fracturing fluid from the produced fracture with attendant delay in resuming the production of formation fluids and severely impair anticipated hydrocarbon production.
However, the use of these conventional additives may give rise to other problems.
First, the necessity of both a fluid loss control additive and a separate breaker additive in a treatment fluid may increase the complexity and cost of a treatment fluid and / or a subterranean application using that fluid.
In some instances, the fluid loss control additives and breaker additives used are toxic and thus may harm the environment; this problem may be aggravated because many are poorly degradable or nondegradable within the environment.
Due to environmental regulations, costly procedures often must be followed to dispose of the treatment fluids containing such compounds, ensuring that they do not contact the marine environment and groundwater.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Clean Viscosified Treatment Fluids and Associated Methods
  • Clean Viscosified Treatment Fluids and Associated Methods

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

[0057]Initially the viscosity of a treatment fluid that did not contain a dual functional additive (such as either a triethyl citrate (TEC), ethyl formate (EF), amyl formate (AF), triacetin (TA), or diethyl malonate (DEM)) was obtained to provide a reference point for comparison. The samples were prepared by dissolving 1.080 g of Cekol 30000 in 150 g of tap water with shear in a small, glass blender jar. After hydrating for a minimum of 30 minutes, the esters were added at the concentrations as noted, followed by 1.4 ml (0.93% v / v) of aluminum crosslinker. All gels were strongly crosslinked upon addition of the crosslinker. Table 1 lists the prepared sample treatment fluids and their pH values.

TABLE 1Prepared Sample Treatment Fluids and pH ValuesEsterFluid initial pHnone4.57 5 gal / Mgal TEC4.1850 gal / Mgal TEC3.8050 gal / Mgal TEC + 10 gal / Mgal EF3.79 5 gal / Mgal TEC + 10 gal / Mgal EF4.37

[0058]Next, the viscosity of the treatment fluid above further containing 5 gal / Mgal of TEC and 50 gal...

example 2

[0059]Treatment fluids were prepared containing Aluminum-crosslinked 60 lb / Mgal CMC gel with one or more of the following dual-functional additives: TEC, amyl formate (AF), triacetin (TA), or diethyl malonate (DEM). For each fluid, the esters were present in the treatment fluid in the form of small droplets. Testing to determine final viscosity and pH was performed and the results show that each of the tested dual-functional additives (esters) used with this invention were capable of reducing the viscosity of the treatment fluid. As can be seen in Table 1, advantageous results were found using a combination of TEC and AF. In addition, TA also improved the viscosity break. DEM was sufficient to break the gel upon release of malonic acid. The results are shown in Table 2. The sample treatment fluids were prepared with the same polymer and crosslinker concentration as in example 1. All of the fluids initially were crosslinked gels. For the static break test procedure, the samples were ...

example 3

[0060]Treatment fluids containing 60 lb / Mgal Al-crosslinked CMC with and without TEC were prepared. In addition, treatment fluids containing 40 lb / Mgal Hybor G (a borate crosslinked guar available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of Duncan, Okla.) were used as a comparison. The fluid loss properties of the treatment fluids were tested. FIG. 2 is a plot of dynamic fluid loss curves as a function of time for the treatment fluids and it shows that fluid loss was about half of that observed by the 40 lb / Mgal Hybor G treatment fluid. Thus, the dual functional additives of the present invention are capable of acting a fluid loss control agents.

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

Treatment fluids comprising an aqueous base fluid, a viscosifying agent, and a compliant dual-functional additive are provided. The present invention provides methods of using the treatment fluids in subterranean formations. One example of a suitable method includes providing a fracturing fluid comprising an aqueous base fluid, a viscosifying agent, and a compliant dual-functional additive that acts as a fluid loss control agent and a breaker and introducing the fracturing fluid into at least a portion of a subterranean formation at a rate and pressure sufficient to create or enhance at least one or more fractures in the subterranean formation.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0001]The present invention relates to fluids useful for subterranean operations, and more particularly, to treatment fluids comprising a compliant dual-functional additive and a viscosifying agent, and methods of use employing such treatment fluids to treat subterranean formations.[0002]Aqueous treatment fluids may be used in a variety of subterranean treatments. Such treatments include, but are not limited to, stimulation operations and completion operations. As used herein, the term “treatment,” or “treating,” refers to any subterranean operation that uses a fluid in conjunction with a desired function and / or for a desired purpose. The term “treatment,” or “treating,” does not imply any particular action by the fluid.[0003]An example of a subterranean treatment using an aqueous treatment fluid is hydraulic fracturing. In a hydraulic fracturing treatment, a viscous fracturing fluid is introduced into the formation at a high enough rate to exert a suffici...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): E21B43/26
CPCC09K8/685C09K8/512
Inventor FUNKHOUSER, GARY P.LIANG, FENGSAINI, RAJESH K.HOLTSCLAW, JEREMYNORMAN, LEWIS R.
Owner HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products