Methods and compositions for removing color from color-treated hair
a technology of color-treated hair and composition, which is applied in the field of methods of removing color from color-treated or pre-dyed hair, can solve the problems of hair fiber damage, may or may not be used, and approach has significant drawbacks of hair fiber damag
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
Removal of HC Blue 15 Using BMIM OAc and SLES
[0426]Hair swatches dyed with HC Blue 15 (Log Pow value around 3.47) were treated with BMIM OAc and sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) at varying concentrations using the protocol described above. The resulting ΔE values are shown in the below table, as well as in FIG. 1.
ConcentrationΔEof organic0 wt.3 wt.6 wt.12 wt.salts (wt. %)% SLES% SLES% SLES% SLES09.0621.0821.8121.8413.5828.6——51.0741.0340.07—105.6147.1——258.639.0——
[0427]As seen from FIG. 1 and the table above, the control sample (with no organic salt or SLES) had a ΔE of 9.06 (approximately 9.1). The results for increasing BMIM OAc concentration alone are reproduced from above. SLES alone enhances removal of dye, increasing the ΔE to around 21-22. Interestingly, increasing concentrations of SLES do not appear to further increase the ΔE. However, once the minimum concentration of SLES is added to BMIM OAc, the ΔE increases well beyond the ΔE for either component alone. This demonstrates ...
example 2
Removal of HC Blue 15 Using EMIM Ethylsulfate and SLES
[0428]Hair swatches dyed with HC Blue 15 (Log Pow value around 3.47) were treated with varying concentrations in water of EMIM ethylsulfate and SLES at 3% concentration using the protocol described above. The resulting ΔE are shown in the below table, as well as in FIG. 2.
Concentration ofΔEorganic salt (wt. %)0 wt. % SLES3 wt. % SLES09.121.112.730.052.132.3101.533.5259.335.25026.827.2
[0429]As seen from FIG. 2 and the table above, the control sample (with no organic salt or SLES) had a ΔE of approximately 9.1. The results for increasing EMIM ethylsulfate concentration alone are reproduced from above. SLES alone enhances removal of dye, increasing the ΔE to around 21-22. As noted in the previous example, increasing concentrations of SLES do not appear to further increase the ΔE. However, once the minimum concentration of SLES (3%) is added to EMIM ethylsulfate, the ΔE increases well beyond the ΔE for either component alone. This de...
example 3
Removal of Hydroxyanthraquinoneaminopropyl Methyl Morpholinium Methosulfate Using BMIM OAc and SLES
[0430]Hair swatches dyed with hydroxyanthraquinoneaminopropyl methyl morpholinium methosulfate (Log Pow value around 0.89) were treated with BMIM OAc and / or SLES solutions using the protocol described above except carried out at 23° C. The resulting ΔE are shown in the below table, as well as in FIG. 3.
10% BMIM10% BMIMOAc - 6%TreatmentWater onlyOAc6% SLESSLESΔE2.97.518.238.7
[0431]As seen in FIG. 3 and the table above, the ΔE value significantly increases when dyed hair fibers are treated with a mixture of 6% SLES and 10% BMIM OAc, indicating that adding BMIM OAc to the SLES solution (6%) significantly boosts the color removal efficacy of hydroxyanthraquinoneaminopropyl methyl morpholinium methosulfate. In fact, the mixture greatly outperforms either the BMIM OAc or SLES by itself, indicating a synergistic effect.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| temperature | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| melting point | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| melting point | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


