Treatment of cancer using photodynamic therapy
A cancerous and tissue-based technology, applied in photodynamic therapy, therapy, phototherapy, etc., can solve problems such as tissue damage, insufficient penetration depth, skin phototoxicity, etc.
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example 1
[0044] A 65-year-old man presented with squamous cell carcinoma of his larynx. He declined surgery and radiation therapy and opted for photodynamic therapy treatment with HPPH (2-(1-hexylethoxy)-2-desvinylpyropheophorbide-a derivative). He was given 4mg / m 2 (approximately 0.1 mg / kg) was infused with HPPH over one hour. The following day he received 665nm athermal low-energy laser treatment (150mw / cm) to activate the photodynamic process. Light is transmitted through a single silica fiber that passes through the laryngoscope. He received 665nm, 50J / cm light for 5.5 minutes. He developed temporary edema and hoarseness, which resolved completely within the first 30 days of follow-up examination after treatment. He did not develop a skin photosensitivity reaction. At 3 months of the second follow-up examination, he was found to be in complete response to treatment. No effects on normal tissue were noted.
example 2
[0046] A 45-year-old man presented with squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. He opted for photodynamic therapy with HPPH (2-(1-hexylethoxy)-2-desvinylpyropheophorbide-a derivative) rather than surgery or radiation therapy. He was injected with 4mg / m 2 HPPH. The following day he received 665nm athermal low-energy laser treatment (150mw / cm) to activate the photodynamic process. Light is transmitted through a single silica fiber that passes through the laryngoscope. He was exposed to 665nm, 50J / cm light for 5.5 minutes. He developed transient moderate pain at the treated site, which was managed with analgesics. This resolved within 30 days of the post-treatment checkup. He did not develop a skin photosensitivity reaction. At 6 months of follow-up examination, he was found to be in complete response to treatment, as confirmed by biopsy. No effects on normal tissue were noted.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 