More importantly, the
safety risk assessment knowledge of deep foundation pit
engineering construction has not yet been expressed in a unified and standardized way, which leads to many different angles and methods for the assessment of safety risks, and also affects the quality and stability of the current assessment work.
It is difficult for the experts participating in the review to fully grasp the information of this
order of magnitude, so the review results are not completely accurate. In addition, such a large amount of
information processing in the risk analysis process also makes the review work consume a lot of time and low efficiency
[0011] To sum up, manual review has difficulties of poor accuracy and low work efficiency
[0012] (2) Lack of an effective mechanism to share and update the safety review knowledge of deep foundation pit engineering construction plans
[0013] Relevant knowledge is scattered in a large amount of various documents, technical materials and experts' minds, and because it is difficult to fully grasp the huge amount of safety review knowledge manually, and the experts participating in the review have their own areas of expertise in deep foundation pit construction safety, It is rare for an expert to have all the knowledge
This knowledge is the accumulation of long-term engineering practice. At present, there is no mature mechanism to organize this knowledge in a standardized manner. This makes it difficult to share the safety review knowledge of deep foundation pit engineering construction plans, which is detrimental to the safety management of deep foundation pit engineering construction. influences
[0014] In addition, as the construction technology of deep foundation pit engineering is constantly being updated and improved, new safety risks and new risk-causing factors will also appear, which makes the safety review knowledge also continuously updated, which also increases the
safety risk from the other hand. The Difficulty of Reviewing
Knowledge Sharing[0015] (3) The information provided by the manual review results is not complete, the form is single, and it is difficult for all staff to understand and grasp
[0024] (2) Pay less attention to how to effectively manage relevant safety
risk assessment knowledge, making it difficult to share relevant knowledge
[0025] (3) The identification and evaluation of risks lacks a systematic perspective, that is, the risks are evaluated individually, and the
mutual influence between risks is less considered
[0026] (4) Evaluation methods are mostly comprehensive evaluations in theory, and it is difficult to evaluate multiple risks with loop characteristics
[0027] (5) There are many studies on evaluation methods, but few studies on how to manage related knowledge
The specific situation of each safety risk event is different, and these associations are quite complicated. It is difficult to reflect the intricate relationship between risk events and risk factors only by assigning a fixed reliability to the value of the
risk factor and then calculating the evaluation value with the aggregation function. too in line with
engineering principles[0031] (2) Separate evaluation of security risk events without considering the
coupling effect between risk events
For example, the deformation of the
enclosure structure will increase the degree of settlement of the surrounding surface, and the increase in the degree of settlement of the surrounding surface will also increase the lateral pressure on the
enclosure structure, further aggravating the deformation of the
enclosure structure
There are still many such engineering and technical relationships in the construction of deep foundation pit engineering, but this patented technology does not consider the
coupling effect between safety risk events, which does not conform to the principles of engineering technology
At present, there are few studies on the safety
risk assessment of deep foundation pit engineering construction involving such a relationship.
[0032] (3) The comprehensive evaluation model cannot deal with the risk
system with loop characteristics
If the relationship between risk events is considered and a risk
system with circuit characteristics is established, the commonly used analysis methods represented by
artificial neural network, event number and fault tree are difficult to play a role in this case
[0033] To sum up, there have been many research results and application cases for the identification and evaluation of safety risks in deep foundation pit engineering construction, but the research and specific technical solutions for the
scientific management of the huge amount of deep foundation pit construction scheme safety review knowledge have not yet been seen. to report