Interstate highway train system

a technology of interstate highways and train systems, applied in the direction of rope railways, roads, construction, etc., can solve the problems of maglev not being the new future of trains, high cost of installing in rural settings, and high cost of maglev in city limits, so as to achieve the effect of reducing energy consumption

Inactive Publication Date: 2006-07-27
LEW HLDG
View PDF19 Cites 13 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0005] This invention relates to a lightweight high-speed train system and utilizes a beam support to eliminate animal and general detrimental environmental effects i.e. to avoid hitting mammals and colliding with other vehicles and the like. It teaches how to achieve a high-speed and safe elevated train by straddling a deep pre-stressed concrete or steel beam with conventional steel train wheels and standard gage width for the rails. Thus it can use standard switching systems, use improved standard switching, or a new ramp switching technology proposed herein which has certain advantages, namely assisting with decelerating the train module entering the station and accelerating it when leaving. It's designed for high-speed long distance travel between cities with people or light freight on the order of 200+ MPH (miles per hour) with a minimum of energy. And since such beams should be thicker near the base to provide side to side stiffness long spans, about 100-150 feet in length between post supports, the side of the beams conveniently provide standard gage rail spacing, another main advantage of this invention over others proposed.

Problems solved by technology

Maglev is very innovative but cost's over $60 million a mile or more to install in a rural setting; much higher costs can occur within city limits.
After China built a 20-mile section at $1.2 billion, it promptly announced maglev wouldn't be the new future for trains in China due to cost and because it doesn't integrate into existing railroading infrastructure.
Innovation by itself is not enough to re-invent train technology, it has to be innovative, economic and work with existing track and road systems.
These rubber tire trains aren't designed to go fast or be maximally fuel-efficient and are generally only used for in-city people transport.
These rubber wheeled train technologies teach a side-to-side shifting of long beams to switch to a new line, which could be cumbersome and dangerous at high speeds.
These trains also suffer from the inefficiency of rubber tires, and low speed capability.
Maglev uses an elevated beam but suffers from very high cost of construction due in part to the precision aligned magnetic rail and high cost of train modules and controls; $60 million a mile was spent for the China project with recent news stories saying Germany is abandoning maglev as a result of the high cost and China also announced in January 2004 it's abandoning maglev as well for it's larger new train system similarly due to cost and because maglev can't integrate with their existing rail system.
The cost of meeting all the above conditions of use with maglev are very high accounting for very limited application of this technology.
Shifting maglev carrier modules to conventional rail is not practical limiting practice between two destination points where shifting to other rail systems is not required.
This is unjustified for a new national train system.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Interstate highway train system
  • Interstate highway train system
  • Interstate highway train system

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

Embodiment Construction

[0035]FIG. 1 shows a train and rail system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The system includes an elevated beam railway and a straddling beam rail vehicle. While the rail vehicle of FIG. 1 is a locomotive, it should be noted that the present invention is applicable to any sort of rail vehicle including rail cars and the like.

[0036] Generally concrete posts or piles 1 supporting rail beam 2 would be spaced and be connected to piles 1 every 120 feet or so depending on the width and thickness of pre-stressed concrete or steel beam 2. All things considered, pile supported beams 2 are probably more economic than at-grade fenced rails foundations, even in deserts, especially considering the economic disadvantages of long fences and due to the potential economic loss that restrictions to local cross traffic can cause. Beam 2 could be steel but generally pre-stressed concrete would be the most cost effective beam support if held under 120 feet between pile suppo...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

PUM

No PUM Login to view more

Abstract

This is an elevated pile supported pre-stressed concrete beam electric high-speed remote-controlled modular train system, including compact high-rise terminals installed within the interstate highway rights-of-ways, a train module astride elevated support beams at standard gage rail widths to fully integrate train modules into existing rail, and since it's within existing interstate highways, fully integrates the new train system with other transportation infrastructures.

Description

CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60 / 646,298, Jan. 24, 2005.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The reason trains haven't re-invented themselves is mainly based on: the kind of innovation used, economics, and incompatibility with existing infrastructure. Maglev is very innovative but cost's over $60 million a mile or more to install in a rural setting; much higher costs can occur within city limits. After China built a 20-mile section at $1.2 billion, it promptly announced maglev wouldn't be the new future for trains in China due to cost and because it doesn't integrate into existing railroading infrastructure. For similar reasons, Germany, having spent billions of dollars developing maglev, promptly announced it would not be applying maglev on a national basis either for the same reasons. Innovation by itself is not enough to re-invent train technology, it has to be innovative, economic and wo...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to view more

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to view more
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): E01B25/22
CPCE01B25/08
Inventor WEAVER, LLOYD E.
Owner LEW HLDG
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Try Eureka
PatSnap group products