In time, the heart becomes so enlarged that it cannot adequately supply blood.
An afflicted patient is fatigued, unable to perform even simple exerting tasks and experiences pain and discomfort.
Furthermore, as the heart enlarges, the internal heart valves cannot adequately close.
This impairs the function of the valves and further reduces the heart's ability to supply blood.
In such cases, the heart may enlarge to such an extent that the adverse consequences of heart enlargement continue after the
viral infection has passed and the
disease continues its progressively debilitating course.
Drug therapy treats the symptoms of the
disease and may slow the progression of the disease.
Furthermore, the drugs sometimes have adverse side effects.
Such patients are extremely sick individuals.
Due to the absence of effective intermediate treatment between
drug therapy and heart transplant,
Class III and IV patients often suffer before qualifying for heart transplant.
Furthermore, after this suffering, the available treatment is often unsatisfactory.
Heart transplant procedures are risky, invasive and relatively expensive, and often extend a patient's life by only relatively short times. For example, prior to transplant, a Class IV patient may have a
life expectancy of six months to one-year.
Even if the risks and expense of heart transplant could be tolerated, this treatment option is becoming increasingly unavailable.
Furthermore, many patients do not qualify for heart transplant for failure to meet any one of a number of qualifying criteria.
This procedure is the subject of some controversy.
It is highly invasive, risky and relatively expensive and commonly includes other relatively expensive procedures (such as a concurrent
heart valve replacement).
Also, the treatment is limited to Class IV patients and, accordingly, provides limited hope to patients facing ineffective
drug treatment prior to Class IV.
Furthermore, the consequences of a failure of this procedure can be severe.
While cardiomyoplasty has produced symptomatic improvement, the nature of the improvement is not fully understood.
Even though cardiomyoplasty has demonstrated symptomatic improvement, at least some studies suggest the procedure only minimally improves cardiac performance.
The procedure is also complicated.
For example, it is sometimes difficult to adequately wrap the
muscle around the heart with a satisfactory fit.
The muscle may stretch after wrapping, thereby reducing its constraining benefits, and is generally not susceptible to post-operative adjustment.
In addition, the muscle may fibrose and adhere to the heart causing undesirable constraint on the contraction of the heart during
systole.
During less-invasive procedures, the surgeon may have more
limited access to the heart and more limited ability to ensure placement and alignment of a jacket on the heart.
Properly placing and securing the jacket on the heart during minimally-invasive delivery procedures of these types can be more difficult than in open-chest procedures.