However, mobility aid users frequently encounter a predicament upon arrival at a chosen destination, that being a convenient way to temporarily store the mobility aid while performing a two-handed task.
As a result, many mobility aid users will clumsily attempt to hold the aid while performing the two-handed task.
Some disadvantages of holding the aid during the task are the risk of dropping the aid, taking excessive time to perform the task, interference with performing the task or generally feeling inept.
However, this presents an opportunity for the mobility aid to fall to the ground.
In doing so, depending on the user's agility, the user may suffer discomfort, injury,
muscle / joint strain, or loss of balance.
Additionally, using a mobility aid quite often has negative connotations that represent a loss of independence, nuisance, awkwardness, and geriatric predisposition.
These factors can discourage the consistent use of a mobility aid or discourage the use of a mobility aid altogether.
While useful to some extent, this design has the drawback of dangling the mobility aid across the user's
torso.
This makes performing the desired task more difficult because the dangling mobility aid is directly in front of the user and may strike or swing into the user.
There is also the possibility of the user
tripping while storing the mobility aid using this device, particularly if the task requires
lower body movement, because the aid may become entangled between the user's legs.
Additionally, cleaning and sanitizing the loop is difficult because the loop is made of a porous rubber-type material.
Furthermore, this device does not place the mobility aid in a “ready-to-use” position or at a safe and proper height where the user may instinctively reach for and use the aid.
Although useful, this design has disadvantages such as: requiring the user to hang the mobility aid such that the aid could drag the ground, the lengthy second loop may catch on environmental objects such as tables and chairs, and the leather-type material is difficult to clean or sanitize.
While useful, this design requires extensive movement of the mobility aid and does not provide for quick subsequent retrieval of the aid in case of an emergency.
Also, these devices are typically fabricated from cloth or leather and are difficult to clean or sanitize.
Although this design may be beneficial when the mobility aid is dropped, by providing a way to retrieve the aid without bending down, it requires that the aid be attached to the tether and this limits freedom of movement.
Additionally, while the user is walking constant energy is required to keep the mobility aid from being retracted or pulled into a non-stable position by the device.
Also, due to the multi-part construction of the device cleaning and sanitization are difficult to perform.
Although somewhat useful, this
wrist mounted device hinders the “hands-free” objective of providing the user with a way to temporarily store the aid while performing a two-handed task.
Also, since the mobility aid is attached to the user's
wrist, it is likely that the aid will interfere with the task at hand.
This device also requires that a tether be attached to the mobility aid and with its multi-part construction may prove difficult to clean or sanitize.
Although this device does permit a user to temporarily store a mobility aid at their side, it requires that a tether be attached to the aid by way of a hook-and-loop
fastener and its multi-part construction may prove difficult to clean or sanitize.
Against this background of innovation, currently available mobility aid retention devices still suffer from severe deficiencies in providing: a readily accessible means for temporary placement; a retention device that does not require affixing anything to the aid; an aid retention device that is ergonomically positioned; a device constructed of high strength materials durable enough to withstand long-term, repeated, daily use; an easily sanitized device; or a device that produces positive perceptions surrounding use of a mobility aid.
Correspondingly, current mobility aid retention devices have not met with significant success to date.