In Spain, slab track is not generally used, but it is used in particular areas such as for example in tunnels, in which the problem and cost of maintenance of the
ballast track are especially high, particularly on high speed lines.
The sections of
pipe have to be cleaned in the interior thereof, moved, connected and disconnected, the total
pipe length being modified, sections implemented or removed as the work advances, which is very laborious.
The lack of space is the main problem for carrying out these works appropriately.
In the case of tunnels with a single track, the problem is heightened even further.
In these tunnels, the difficulty of the work is greater, the options very limited and the yields of concreting are reduced.
The traditional methods of concreting slab track described are laborious, the mechanical means and above all manpower required are high, the degree of
automation is low and the yields are limited.
The logistics of the supply and pouring process of the concrete is not efficient, interferences among the different activities being frequent.
The coordination of the tasks is complex, the stoppages are usually frequent due to various reasons and the stoppage times can be long.
Other noteworthy problems are those associated with pumping the concrete in the case where this
system is used: blockages in the
pipe, etc.
Moreover, it should be pointed out that one problem in any of the many stages of the process usually causes the interruption of the concreting, with the consequences which these stoppages cause under these conditions.
However, on the other hand, it has significant disadvantages which ultimately limit its competitiveness:the cost is very high due to the high cost involved with a special
train with mixers and due to the cost involved with constructing the provisional auxiliary trackthe flexibility of the method is low.
The concrete volume to be pumped is limited by the capacity of the
train (no. of mixers).
And in turn, the initial
dimensioning of the
train and the volume with which it is loaded will limit the process.
In this aspect, it is difficult to scale.once the concrete of the train has been depleted, it must exit in order to reload, the concreting process being interrupted.given the process described and the cost thereof, this
system is only cost-effective for constructing long lengths of slab trackin the case of there not being sufficient space for constructing the adjacent auxiliary track, or in the case of it not being possible to construct it for any reason, the use of this method would not be viablethe use of the pump continues bringing with it certain related problems.
The flow rate of concrete is limited by the capacity of the pump.
However, the system still has all the drawbacks described, even being heightened, given the implemented dimensions.
Bringing the loading point of the train closer is all that has been achieved, but if we consider the lengths of the tunnel, each time the train has to reload, the stoppage time (movement+loading+return) amounts to many hours, time during which the concreting remains interrupted.