A first drawback of such a garment consists in that the boots of such a garment are not made for walking and do not permit to ensure a sufficient support for the foot of the fisherman, which is problematic when this fisherman moves in a river bed including obstacles such as stones, tree branches or grasses.
Another drawback consists in that, when the fisherman wishes to go to another fishing location (in particular by using his vehicle), he must remove his clothing, which is a long and tedious operation, namely because such clothing is wet, more particularly inside, due to perspiration.
This drawback is amplified when the fisherman is old and / or when the temperatures are low, namely when the water is cold, which is the case when the fisherman is fishing to catch salmonids in whitewater.
In addition, when the water is cold (which is usually the case in whitewater, namely for salmonid fishing), the garment is uncomfortable and the fisherman can get cold.
This solution has however the drawback of making it even more difficult to remove this fishing garment.
A first drawback consists in that the welding or gluing of the inner-boots to the legs represents sensitive spots, which can loosen and affect the water resistance of the fishing garment.
In addition, these shoes are not waterproof and do not permit to prevent the penetration, inside of these shoes, of stones that are likely to pierce the inner-boots, which are then no longer waterproof.
Another drawback consists in that wearing such a fishing garment does not permit a fisherman to move, in particular by car, without removing all his fishing garment.
A first drawback of this fishing garment consists in that, when placing a leg of the pants on the boot, it is necessary to pass the flange of such a leg under the rim of the ring of a boot, which, on the one hand, requires a significant effort and, on the other hand, does not permit to visualize whether said flange is correctly positioned with respect to the ring and under the rim, which is detrimental to the tightness and following the dressing operations.
In addition, when clamping the clamping strip on the ring of the boot, this clamping strip exerts a traction on the flange of the leg of the pants, which, on the one hand, causes a deformation of this leg and generates a risk of lack of tightness between the pants and the boot and, on the other hand, is detrimental to the comfort of the fisherman.
In addition, the clamping strip only presses the flange of the leg of the pants against the rim of the boot ring, which does not permit to ensure sufficient support of such a leg of the pants on such a boot, in particular because of the tensile stresses exerted on the pants and on the boots by the fisherman, namely when putting on the fishing garment and when the fisherman moves (namely squats down) or walks.
In addition, the bolt, which the clamping strip includes, is particularly fragile and subjected to shocks (namely when the fisherman hits an obstacle), which does not permit to guarantee a proper and lasting clamping of the clamping strip on the boot.. Finally, the clamping strip is a removable element that the fisherman is likely to forget when preparing his equipment before going fishing and that he is likely to lose in the event of a malfunction of the lock.
A drawback of this garment consists in that the elastic flap does not permit to ensure an adequate tightness between this elastic flap and the leg of the pants, so that water can penetrate inside the boots.
Another drawback consists in that, under the action of the movements of the wearer of the garment (walking, bending, squatting, falling), the leg of the pants exerts a traction on the elastic flap, which, because of its elasticity, tends to deform and release the leg of the pants, which is then no longer fastened to the boot.
A drawback of this garment consists in that the boot must have an inner wall and an outer wall that are flexible, so that they can be folded and folded back onto themselves.
This flexibility, as well as the folding and folding back are detrimental to the water tightness of the garment.
In addition, according to another drawback, the insertion of the leg of the pants between the inner and outer walls as well as this folding and this folding back are tedious operations for the wearer of the garment.
Finally, the immobilization requires a clamping of the belt, which, in order to ensure tightness, compresses the calf of the wearer of the garment, which is at least uncomfortable, even painful.