Polycarbonate composition for producing optical quality products with high quality and good processability
A kind of polycarbonate, thermoplastic composition technology, applied in the field of thermoplastic composition
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1- Embodiment 3
[0162] Example 1-Example 3: Comparison of GMS and GTS as release agent
[0163] Table 1 shows the formulations of Examples 1-3. For electrostatic charges ( Figure 1-Figure 3 The resulting compositions were tested against examples 1-3) and fouling respectively (see Table 1). In Table 1, numbers below GMS and GTS indicate formulated / measured ppm levels and the average (ave.) static charge was determined by averaging the static charge of the last 200 molded discs.
[0164]
[0165] Example 1 including GTS has a positive average electrostatic charge on the surface, while Examples 2 and 3 including GMS have negative average electrostatic charges, see respectively Figure 1-Figure 3 . Also, Table 1 shows that by using GTS there is a significant reduction in dry fouling.
Embodiment 4- Embodiment 15
[0166] Example 4-Example 15: Effect of GMS and GTS on average static charge
Embodiment 4
[0167] Example 4 is a commercial polycarbonate composition comprising interfacial polycarbonate and GMS. The electrostatic charge of the samples was determined and shown as a data curve with a positive average electrostatic charge in image 3 middle. The sample has a positive electrostatic charge due to the interfacial polycarbonate.
[0168] Table 2 shows the formulations of Examples 5-15. The resulting composition was tested for electrostatic charge (see Figure 4 and Figure 5 ), where the average static charge is determined by averaging the static charge of the last 200 molded discs.
[0169]
[0170] Figure 4 and Figure 5 And Table 2 shows that the compositions of Example 9 and Example 15, which did not include GMS or GTS, had low average static charge values of -13.9 and -7.9, respectively. It should be noted that the average static charge of these two examples is different, this is because it is difficult to control the average static charge in the composi...
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| melt flow index | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| number average molecular weight | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| number average molecular weight | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More