A control system and control method for controlling the attitude angle of an aircraft
A control system and controller technology, applied in the field of aircraft, can solve problems such as poor self-adaptation and poor flight stability of aircraft
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment approach
[0109] According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the PID parameter incremental actual value conversion sub-module 224 performs the following processing: Δk P ’=ΔK P '*k uP ; Δk I ’=ΔK I '*k uI ; Δk D ’=ΔK D '*k uD .
[0110] Among them, k uP Expressed in relation to ΔK P ’ Carry out language value to actual value Δk P ’ The deblurring factor used in conversion, k uI Expressed in relation to ΔK I ’ Carry out language value to actual value Δk I ’ The deblurring factor used in conversion, k uD Expressed in relation to ΔK D ’ Carry out language value to actual value Δk D ’ The deblurring factor to use when converting.
[0111] According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 5 As shown, the weight distribution module 3 includes an absolute value calculation sub-module 31 and a weight distribution sub-module 32 .
[0112] Wherein, the absolute value obtaining sub-module 31 is used to perform absolute value processin...
Embodiment
[0174] The present invention is further described by simulink simulation experiments below. However, these examples are only exemplary and do not constitute any limitation to the protection scope of the present invention.
[0175] In the simulink simulation example, adopt the system of the present invention, set k e = 2,k ec = 1,k uP =0.55,k uI =0.2,k uD =0.1, wherein, make the pitch angle of input be 10 °, simulation time is 30 seconds, add the impulse signal that size is 10 ° as disturbance at t=15s place, the system of the present invention is tested, the result is as follows Figure 9 shown.
Embodiment 1
[0187] The response time of embodiment 1 and comparative example 2 is 6s, and the response time of comparative example 1 is 10s;
[0188] (4) compare the perturbed situation of embodiment 1 and comparative examples 1 to 2:
[0189] The maximum overshoot of the embodiment relative to the disturbance signal is 18%, and the time to return to the steady state is 3s; the maximum overshoot of the comparative example 1 relative to the disturbance signal is 27.5%, and the time to return to the steady state is 5s; Comparative example 2 The maximum overshoot relative to the disturbance signal is 16.5%, and the time to return to the steady state is 3s.
[0190] As can be seen from the above, (a) relative to the conventional PID control of the system of the present invention, the overshoot is reduced to 17% by 27.5%, and the time to reach stability is reduced by 40%; (b) relative to the fuzzy PID control, the steady state can reach no static Poor, the adjustment range of fuzzy PID parame...
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


