Central account recording type decentralized distributed data processing method and system

Abstract

The invention relates to a central account recording type decentralized distributed data processing method and system. The method comprises the steps of: obtaining data information needing to be stored; verifying the legality of the data information; if the data information is legal, processing and packaging the candidate pool data information sequentially into a new block and signed; broadcastingto a P2P network; verifying the legality of the new block; and if the verification is passed, attaching the new block to the back of the block chain. According to the invention, the coin attribute ofthe block chain is eliminated, the complexity of the system is reduced, the efficiency is greatly improved, the purposiveness of the system is purified, a pure trusted evidence storage function is restored, bifurcation can be avoided when block chain software is updated, and the security of the system is enhanced.

Description

technical field [0001] The invention belongs to the technical field of block chains, and in particular relates to a central accounting type decentralized distributed data processing method and system. Background technique [0002] Since the development of blockchain technology, consensus on-chain in data storage has always been a focus and pain point. The distributed nature of the blockchain technology itself, especially the open nature adopted to achieve decentralization, makes it a principled requirement to achieve data consistency at all nodes. In other words, if the data cannot be consistent, the district The so-called non-tamperable ability and natural "credibility" of the blockchain have been defeated. Blockchain is also a kind of streaming data, and new data will be added continuously. Consistency must require that the generation of new data must go through a consistent process. In the actual process, the submitted content is often larger than the content that can b...

AI Technical Summary

Problems solved by technology

[0008] In addition, existing technology cannot balance the negative correlation between decentralization and efficiency: all the inventions of the above-mentioned consensus are from the West, and this contradiction comes to some extent from Western social ideas, and decentralization makes it the first problem, and then Consider efficiency improvements

Constrained by it Traditional blockchain consensus mechanisms are based on the concept of internal autonomy, it is difficult to break through the contradiction between decentralization and efficiency

[0009] At the same time, it will also cause blockchain software updates to fork: a larger common problem with the above consensuses is that their implementation will lead to forks in software updates, because when the consensus group occurs, the community will split

This kind of thing can be avoided under normal circumstances (those who do not obey the rules can be kicked out according to the rules), but when the software itself is updated and consensus steps are involved, it is difficult to deal with (in an asynchronous environment, Nodes cannot be kicked out because they are upgraded relatively sooner or later, otherwise the community will disperse and the system will self-solve), which will eventually lead to blockchain forks, and the consequences of blockchain forks are very serious

Images