Unlock instant, AI-driven research and patent intelligence for your innovation.

Viral vector production system

a technology of vector production system and virus, which is applied in the direction of viruses/bacteriophages, drug compositions, dsdna viruses, etc., can solve the problems of less predictable or more variable, less robust gene expression of tissue specific promoters, and adverse expression of protein encoded by transgene/noi

Active Publication Date: 2020-01-28
OXFORD BIOMEDICA (UK) LTD
View PDF4 Cites 1 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0022]We have shown that this problem can be overcome by using a heterologous translation control system in eukaryotic cell cultures to repress the translation of the NOI and thus repress or prevent expression of the protein encoded by the NOI. We have surprisingly found that use of this system does not impede the production of packageable vector genome molecules nor the activity of vector virions, and does not interfere with the long-term expression of the NOI in the target cell.
[0023]In one aspect, the present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence comprising a binding site operably linked to a nucleotide of interest, wherein the binding site is capable of interacting with an RNA-binding protein such that translation of the nucleotide of interest is repressed or prevented in a viral vector production cell.
[0042]We demonstrate for the first time the use of a bacterial translation repressor system to increase RNA (retroviral) vector titres in eukaryotic cell production systems by repressing translation of the NOI mRNA. The placement of a binding site for an RNA binding protein (e.g. a TRAP-binding sequence, tbs) upstream of the NOI translation initiation codon allows specific repression of translation of mRNA derived from the internal expression cassette, whilst having no detrimental effect on production or stability of vector RNA. We have also shown that production and function of retroviral vectors appeared to be minimally affected by the presence of the tbs in the vector genome. This implies that either reverse transcriptase (RT) can displace TRAP from the tbs or that TRAP is not efficiently bound to the tbs in the context of the long vector genome RNA packaged within the virion. We have also shown that a similar configuration of tbs placed within the NOI expression cassette of DNA viral vectors, such as AAV, allows NOI translation repression by TRAP whilst maintaining production of active viral vector virions.
[0046]The RNA-binding protein (e.g. TRAP) open-reading frame may be codon-optimised for expression in mammalian (e.g. Homo sapiens) cells, since the bacterial gene sequence is likely to be non-optimal for expression in mammalian cells. The sequence may also be optimised by removing potential unstable sequences and splicing sites. The use of a HIS-tag C-terminally expressed on the TRAP protein appears to offer a benefit in terms of translation repression and may optionally be used. This C-terminal HIS-tag may improve solubility or stability of the TRAP within eukaryotic cells, although an improved functional benefit cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, both HIS-tagged and untagged TRAP allowed robust repression of transgene expression. Certain cis-acting sequences within the RNA-binding protein (e.g. TRAP) transcription unit may also be optimised; for example, EF1a promoter-driven constructs enable better repression with low inputs of TRAP plasmid compared to CMV promoter-driven constructs in the context of transient transfection.

Problems solved by technology

A significant limitation of producing therapeutic retroviral vectors at high or even moderate titres can be the adverse expression of the protein encoded by the transgene / NOI in production cells, particularly when the transgene is driven by a powerful, constitutive promoter.
Tissue-specific promoters to silence transgene expression in production cells have been used as a solution to this problem but a significant drawback with this approach is that often gene expression from tissue specific promoters is not as robust as it is from constitutive ones, and can be less predictable or more variable in the different animal models that are utilised during vector development.
This implies that either reverse transcriptase (RT) can displace TRAP from the tbs or that TRAP is not efficiently bound to the tbs in the context of the long vector genome RNA packaged within the virion.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Viral vector production system
  • Viral vector production system
  • Viral vector production system

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

FP Expression Regulation in Transient Co-Transfection with TRAP-Expression Plasmids

[0591]The GFP reporter construct pCMV-tbsGFP was constructed as described in FIG. 6. A TRAP binding sequence (tbs) was inserted into the construct such that the 5′UTR encoded (from 5′ to 3′) a 41nt leader, the 55nt tbs and a 9nt region encoding the kozak consensus sequence immediately upstream of the GFP ATG codon. These GFP reporter constructs were derived from the experimental EIAV vector genome pONY8.4RC-GFP by deletion of the region between the two CMV promoters (see FIG. 6).

[0592]In more detail, regarding the details of the fluorescent gene expression reporters, the GFP reporter gene was chosen for the initial evaluation experiments so that relatively quick assessment of gene regulation could be carried out by flow cytometry. GFP is not known to be toxic or detrimental to vector production but was used as a sensitive model for gene expression regulation by TRAP / tbs. Moreover, the existing vector ...

example 2

ion of TRAP-Expression Plasmid Expression

[0596]Expression from pCI-Neo based plasmids can be subject to or direct competition with other CMV-driven DNA cassettes. For this reason it was hypothesised that pCI-coTRAP[H6] cotransfected with pCMV-tbsGFP at the 1 / 10th dose might have been subject to this type of competition, since also pCI-Neo was used as stuffer DNA to normalise DNA load (after this experiment pBlueScript was then used as the standard stuffer DNA for all other experiments). Therefore, the EF1a-driven construct pEF1a-coTRAP[H6] was made as described above and tested in cotransfections with pCMV-tbsGFP at different ratios. FIG. 9D summarises the repression of GFP in cells cotransfected with either pCI-coTRAP[H6] or pEF1a-coTRAP[H6] together with the GFP reporter constructs. These data demonstrate that pEF1a-coTRAP[H6] can be cotransfected with tbs-GFP reporter DNA at the 1 / 10th dose and maintain the level of GFP repression observed at the 1:1 ratio (in this case, MFI data...

example 3

n of Different TRAP Homologues

[0599]In addition to TRAP of Bacillus subtilis, two other TRAP homologues were shown to mediate repression of GFP expression from cells co-transfected with pCMV-tbsGFP and TRAP-expression plasmid (FIG. 11A). The TRAP genes from Desulfotomaculum hydrothermale and Aminomonas paucivorans were codon / sequence-optimised and cloned into the pEF1a-based expression plasmid; both of these variants included C-terminal HIS6 tags. These TRAP variants shared 75% and 55% amino acid homology with that of Bacillus subtilis TRAP, respectively. All three variants were capable of GFP expression repression in HEK293T cells in the order of 2 Logs, demonstrating that TRAP homologues with only 55% sequence homology are capable of function in the TRIP system. All three homologues were conserved in sequences involved in RNA and tryptophan binding sites (data not shown).

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

The present invention relates to a nucleic acid sequence comprising a binding site operably linked to a nucleotide of interest, wherein the binding site is capable of interacting with an RNA-binding protein such that translation of the nucleotide of interest is repressed in a viral vector production cell.

Description

[0001]This application is the national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT / GB2014 / 053813, filed on Dec. 19, 2014, and claiming priority to GB Application No. 1322798.8. filed on Dec. 20, 2013, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]The invention relates to the production of viral vectors. More specifically, the present invention relates to modification of the translation of a nucleotide of interest which is encoded by a viral vector, in a viral vector production cell.BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION[0003]Gene therapy broadly involves the use of genetic material to treat disease. It includes the supplementation in cells with defective genes (e.g. those harbouring mutations) with functional copies of those genes, the inactivation of improperly functioning genes and the introduction of new therapeutic genes.[0004]Therapeutic genetic material may be incorporated into the target cells of a host using vectors to enable the tran...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Patents(United States)
IPC IPC(8): C12N15/86C12N7/00
CPCC12N15/86C12N7/00C12N2740/15043C12N2840/55C12N2740/15052C12N2840/102C12N2710/10343C12N2710/10351C12N2740/15051C12N2740/16043C12N2740/16051C12N2750/14143C12N2750/14151A61P43/00A61K48/00
Inventor FARLEY, DANIELMITROPHANOUS, KYRIACOS
Owner OXFORD BIOMEDICA (UK) LTD