Apparatus and method for performing nerve conduction studies with localization of evoked responses

Abstract

An apparatus and method for detecting physiological function, for example, nerve conduction, is described. In one embodiment the apparatus includes a housing including a stimulator shaped to fit a first anatomical site and a detector shaped to fit a second anatomical site. The housing automatically positions the detector substantially adjacent to the second anatomical site when the stimulator is positioned substantially adjacent to the first anatomical site. The detector contains a plurality of individual detection elements, whereby the response evoked by stimulation at the first anatomical site is measured using one or more of these detection elements at the second anatomical location.

Description

REFERENCE TO PENDING PRIOR PATENT APPLICATIONS[0001]This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 06 / 269,126, filed Feb. 15, 2001, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 625,502, filed Jul. 26, 2000, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 270,550, filed Mar. 16, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,386), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09 / 022,990, filed Feb. 12, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,976,094), which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08 / 886,861, filed Jul. 1, 1997 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,851,191), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]This invention relates to apparatus and methods for the assessment of neuromuscular function. More specifically, this invention relates to apparatus and methods for diagnosing peripheral nerve and muscle diseases based on the assessment of neuromuscular funct...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0009]In accordance with the present invention, an apparatus and method are provided for the substantially automated, rapid, and efficient assessment of neuromuscular function without requiring the involvement of highly trained personnel. The assessment of neuromuscular function is effected by stimulating a nerve, and then measuring the response of a muscle innervated by that nerve. The muscle response is detected by measuring the myoelectric potential generated by the muscle in response to the stimulus.

Problems solved by technology

These conditions affect approximately thirty to forty million individuals each year in the United States alone, and have an associated economic cost greater then $100 billion annually.

However, despite their extensive impact on individuals and the health care system, the detection and monitoring of such neuromuscular diseases are based on outdated and inaccurate clinical techniques or rely on expensive referrals to a specialist.

Even experienced physicians find it difficult to diagnose and stage the severity of neuromuscular dysfunction based on symptoms alone.

First, it requires a highly trained specialist.

As a result, it is expensive and generally requires weeks or months to complete.

Second, because they are not readily available, formal nerve conduction studies are generally performed late in the episode of care, thus serving a confirmatory role rather than a diagnostic one.

However, personnel in these environments generally do not have the neurophysiological and neuroanatomical training to perform such studies.

This instrument, however, does not provide any assistance in the correct placement of stimulation and detection electrodes.

Both systems suffer from several significant disadvantages, however.

First, both systems are large, bulky, and constructed from rigid structures that create a supporting fixture for the arm and hand of an adult.

This severely limits their portability and increases their cost.

Second, these systems are only applicable to specific limbs and are not generally applicable to numerous anatomical sites.

In particular, these systems provide no physiological localization of the electrodes, and as a result multiple placements are often required to find the correct electrode location.

Although this invention is useful in its intended application of nerve preservation during surgery, it could not be used to simplify or automate nerve conduction studies because it does not provide means to locate the evoked response, leaving this difficult task to the operator.

Images