Looking for breakthrough ideas for innovation challenges? Try Patsnap Eureka!

Method and Apparatus for Controlling Herbivore Fowl Populations

a technology controlling methods, applied in the field of methods and apparatus for controlling herbivore fowl populations, can solve the problems of increasing conflicts between man and bird, reducing natural predation of animals such as foxes, coyotes and wolves, and varying severity of interactions

Inactive Publication Date: 2015-03-12
2345422 ONTARIO
View PDF19 Cites 7 Cited by
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Description
  • Claims
  • Application Information

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The present patent text describes a solution to the problem of herbivore fowl populations, like Canada geese, causing nuisance in places where they are not desired, such as parks, lawns, and golf courses. The invention has been designed to help herbivore waterfowl populations avoid such areas, reducing the impact on landowners and improving overall quality of life.

Problems solved by technology

Additionally, natural predation from animals such as foxes, coyotes and wolves has gradually reduced owing to population declines of these predators, in part due to human expansion on lands they previously habituated.
For many bird species, these changes have also resulted in an increase in conflicts between man and bird.
This is particularly the case during seasons where the fowl are moulting and have lost their flight feathers and / or are raising newly hatched young that are not yet capable of flight.
These interactions range in severity from being a nuisance to being extremely costly, or even deadly in the case of fowl congregating in aircraft flight paths.
In addition to terrorizing the geese, these deterrent methods can often annoy humans (particularly noise and light-related harassment techniques) and often require the modification of landscapes in undesirable ways by saturating grassy areas with chemical repellents, allowing grass to grow to longer lengths, erecting barriers that impede human traffic as well as waterfowl traffic, and the display of visual deterrents that can be unsightly in a natural environment.
While the provision of alternative feeding areas is stated to enhance the effectiveness of most hazing techniques, providing a suitable area is often impractical in practice.
A second type of repellent that is available is anthraquinone-based (for example, sold as GOOSECHASE®), which is also safe for humans but is unpalatable and causes a feeling of digestive irritation for geese.
However, the application of repellents over large grassy areas is costly and requires re-application after rains or irrigation, as well as after the grass is mowed, in order to maintain effectiveness.
Moreover, the widespread spraying of chemicals is not desirable in recreational areas.
Thus, for areas with maintained lawns, such as parks, lawns and golf courses, the use of repellents is generally costly and ineffective as a long-term solution for the control of nuisance herbivore fowl populations, and in particular herbivore waterfowl populations such as Canada geese.
Ultimately, methods involving harassment prove to be ineffective in the long term for one primary reason—the bird's need to survive trumps mankind's desire and his allowable resources to eliminate them.
Owing to the lack of long-term effect, and despite the knowledge and availability of various methods of controlling the location in which nuisance herbivore fowl populations congregate, including the use of repellents, the use of alternative feeding areas, and their combination, there remains significant problems in the effective application of these methods.

Method used

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
View more

Image

Smart Image Click on the blue labels to locate them in the text.
Viewing Examples
Smart Image
  • Method and Apparatus for Controlling Herbivore Fowl Populations
  • Method and Apparatus for Controlling Herbivore Fowl Populations
  • Method and Apparatus for Controlling Herbivore Fowl Populations

Examples

Experimental program
Comparison scheme
Effect test

example 1

Comparative Example

[0101]A problem was experienced with a nuisance population of approximately one hundred Canada Geese in a multi-use park area. The area was approximately 20,000 square feet, with shortly cropped grass, shady areas, and both a gently sloping lawn descending to the water as well as boat ramps extending into the water. In total, approximately 125 lineal feet of the area provided favourable access for geese to move between the water and the grassy area, with the remainder of the grassy area bordered by water being raised sea walls that were not attractive entry points but still suitable as an escape route for the geese. As in many instances with nuisance waterfowl populations, modifying the landscape to discourage geese was deemed to be impractical and undesirable to the humans who also wish to use the same space. For example, it was deemed impractical to allow the grass to grow to longer lengths in the widely used park area and also deemed impractical to eliminate or...

example 2

Use of Adulterated, Repellent-Treated, Feed and Non-Adulterated Feed to Control Goose Populations in a Recreational Area

[0104]Owing to the problems encountered with both wide-scale repellent spraying and the use of repellent-treated feed on its own, a new approach to controlling the goose population at the site of Example 1 was developed. In this new approach, both repellent-adulterated feed in the form of cracked corn treated with methyl anthranilate, and non-adulterated feed (also in the form of cracked corn) was used. By using non-adulterated feed as an attractant, it was found that the geese were quickly and effectively lured away from the desirable grassy area by providing a more desirable food as an alternative to the grass upon which the geese had been feeding. It was also found that the use of a more attractive food source allowed the geese to be moved to non-traditional feeding sites that did not have short-cut grass.

[0105]In this approach to controlling the goose populatio...

example 3

Use of Adulterated, Repellent-Treated, Feed and Non-Adulterated Feed to Control Goose Populations at a Cottage

[0111]Using feeders of the same design as described in Example 2, a population of approximately one hundred Canada geese that had for a number of years been considered a nuisance population at a residential cottage fronting onto a lake was targeted. The site was made particularly attractive to the geese owing to the presence of a large lawn between the cottage and water. In this application of the present invention, as depicted in FIG. 2, repellent station 114 was installed adjacent to access 200 to grassy area 100 where the geese entered the property when emerging from water 104. Access to grassy area 100 from water 104 was restricted by dock area 202. Owing to the lack of a suitably sized area that could serve as an alternative feeding site on land, attractant stations 118 were installed on a man-made rock breakwater 204 that extended from the shore into water 104 on one s...

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

PUM

No PUM Login to View More

Abstract

A method and apparatus is provided for controlling the location in which herbivore fowl populations congregate by altering the behaviour of the fowl through the combination of providing a strong disincentive to populate areas where the presence of the fowl is not desired and a strong incentive to populate a proximate area where the presence of fowl can be tolerated. For herbivore waterfowl, and in particular Canada geese, the adjacent area also provides the waterfowl with a means of egress to water as an escape from predators and other perceived threats. The method uses a deterrent in the form of adulterated feed to dissuade the herbivore fowl from congregating in areas in which their presence is not desired and the use of an attractant in the form of non-adulterated feed to encourage the herbivore fowl to congregate in a proximate area in which their presence can be tolerated.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0001]The present invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for controlling the manner in which nuisance herbivore fowl populations, and in particular Canada geese populations, congregate by altering the behaviour of the fowl through the combination of providing a disincentive to congregate in areas where their presence is not desired, and an incentive to congregate in one or more alternative areas where their presence can be tolerated.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0002]Certain species of birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, which in turn is Federal Law in Mexico, the United States of America and Canada. Historically the species governed by these laws migrated along flight paths with a change in seasons. Several events have affected how man and these birds have interacted. For example, when DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) was banned in the 1970s, its negative effect to bird eggshells was eliminated and threatened bird...

Claims

the structure of the environmentally friendly knitted fabric provided by the present invention; figure 2 Flow chart of the yarn wrapping machine for environmentally friendly knitted fabrics and storage devices; image 3 Is the parameter map of the yarn covering machine
Login to View More

Application Information

Patent Timeline
no application Login to View More
Patent Type & Authority Applications(United States)
IPC IPC(8): A01K39/01
CPCA01K39/01A01K5/0291A01K15/02A01K39/00A01K39/012A01M29/00A01M29/12A01M31/008A01M31/002A01N25/002A01N31/08
Inventor ERLICH, DAN
Owner 2345422 ONTARIO
Who we serve
  • R&D Engineer
  • R&D Manager
  • IP Professional
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Industry Leading Data Capabilities
  • Powerful AI technology
  • Patent DNA Extraction
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More
PatSnap group products