Method and Apparatus for Controlled or Programmable Cutting of Multiple Nested Tubulars

Abstract

A methodology and apparatus for cutting shape(s) or profile(s) through well tubular(s), or for completely circumferentially severing through multiple tubulars, including all tubing, pipe, casing, liners, cement, other material encountered in tubular annuli. This rigless apparatus utilizes a computer-controlled, downhole robotic three-axis rotary mill to effectively generate a shape(s) or profile(s) through, or to completely sever in a 360 degree horizontal plane wells with multiple, nested strings of tubulars whether the tubulars are concentrically aligned or eccentrically aligned. This is useful for well abandonment and decommissioning where complete severance is necessitated and explosives are prohibited, or in situations requiring a precise window or other shape to be cut through a single tubular or plurality of tubulars.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14 / 381,184, filed on Jan. 12, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,759,030), which entered the U.S. national stage from PCT patent application serial number PCT / US2011 / 065148, with international filing date Dec. 15, 2011, which claims the benefit of both U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61 / 423,950, filed on Dec. 16, 2010, and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61 / 423,961, filed on Dec. 16, 2010.[0002]The following applications are incorporated herein by reference:[0003]U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14 / 381,184, filed on Dec. 15, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,759,030), entitled “Method and Apparatus For Programmable Robotic Rotary Mill Cutting Of Multiple Nested Tubulars”[0004]PCT patent application serial number PCT / US2011 / 065148, with international filing date Dec. 15, 2011 entitled “Method and Apparatus For Programmable Robotic Rotary Mill Cutting Of Multiple Nested Tub...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

The patent is about a new system for monitoring the flow of fluid in a wellbore. Unlike traditional systems, this system uses turbine flow meters to continuously monitor the flow of fluid through each hose, which provides an early warning system to alert operators to any flow anomalies. This system can detect leaks and blockages in the hoses, and can identify which hose is having the flow anomaly and how serious it is. This allows operators to fix the problem quickly and in an environmentally benign manner. The technical benefits of this system are improved monitoring of fluid flow and quicker detection and repair of problems.

Problems solved by technology

When oil and gas wells are no longer commercially viable, they must be abandoned in accord with government regulations.

The mechanical blade cutter trip back into the wellbore to the previous tubular cut location for additional cutting is compromised because the length of the work string varies due to temperature changes or occasionally human error in marking or counting work string joints.

Consequently, it is difficult to precisely align successive cuts with earlier cuts.

Non-concentric, multiple, nested tubulars present serious difficulties for mechanical blade cutters.

Additionally, existing abrasive waterjet cutters also experience difficulties and failures to make cuts through multiple, nested tubulars.

However, the prior art in abrasive waterjet et cutters for casing severance often results in spiraling cuts with narrow kerfs in which the end point of the attempted circumferential cut fails to meet the beginning point of the cut after the cutting tool has made a full 360 degree turn.

In other words, the cut does not maintain an accurate horizontal plane throughout the 360 degree turn, and complete severance fails to be achieved.

Another problem encountered by existing abrasive waterjet et cutting is the inability to cut all the way through the thicker, more widely spaced mass of non-concentrically positioned tubulars.

A further disadvantage of traditional abrasive waterjet cutting is that in order to successfully cut multiple, nested tubulars downhole, air must be pumped into the well bore to create an “air pocket” around the area where the cutting is to take place, such that the abrasive waterjet et tool is not impeded by water or wellbore fluid.

The presence of fluid in the cutting environment greatly limits the effectiveness of existing abrasive waterjet cutting.

Additionally, existing cutting systems fail to provide the operator with direct confirmation of a complete cut being made.

When working offshore, this lifting verification process occurs before even more costly heavy lift boats are deployed to the site.

This method of verification is both time-consuming and expensive.

However, these milling methods do not completely sever multiple, nested non-concentric tubulars for well abandonment.

However, this method does not permit 360 degree circumferential severance of multiple, nested tubulars and is not suited for the purpose of well abandonment.

These conventionally available systems either take excessive times in cutting, and / or have negative environmental impacts.

When oil and gas wells are no longer commercially viable, they must be abandoned in accord with government regulations.

Using explosive shape charges to sever multiple, nested tubulars in order to remove them has negative environmental impacts, and regulators worldwide are limiting the use of explosives.

Rotary drive systems are both cumbersome and expensive to have at the work site.

Existing mechanical blade cutters are deficient because, among other reasons, the mechanical blade cutters may break when they encounter non-concentric tubulars.

Another deficiency is the limitation on the number of nested tubulars that may be severed by the mechanical blade cutter at one time or trip into the wellbore.

However, there is no current capability for severing a multiple non-concentrically (eccentrically) nested tubulars that provides consistent time and cost results in a single trip into the wellbore.

Thus these fundamental problems of existing mechanical blade cutting persist.

The mechanical blade cutter trip back into the wellbore to the previous tubular cut location for additional cutting is compromised because the length of the work string varies due to temperature changes or occasionally human error in marking or counting work string joints.

Consequently, it is difficult to precisely align successive cuts with earlier cuts.

Non-concentric, multiple, nested tubulars present serious difficulties for mechanical blade cutters.

Existing abrasive waterjet cutters also experience difficulties and failures to make cuts through multiple, nested tubulars.

However, the prior art in abrasive waterjet cutters for casing severance often results in spiraling cuts with narrow kerfs in which the end point of the attempted circumferential cut fails to meet the beginning point of the cut after the cutting tool has made a full 360-degree turn.

In other words, the cut does not maintain an accurate horizontal plane throughout the 360-degree turn, and complete severance fails to be achieved.

Another problem encountered by existing abrasive waterjet cutting is the inability to cut all the way through the thicker, more widely spaced mass of non-concentrically positioned tubulars.

A further disadvantage of traditional abrasive waterjet et cutting is that in order to successfully cut multiple, nested tubulars downhole, air must be pumped into the well bore to create an “air pocket” around the area where the cutting is to take place, such that the abrasive waterjet et tool is not impeded by water or wellbore fluid.

The presence of fluid in the cutting environment greatly limits the effectiveness of existing abrasive waterjet cutting.

When working offshore, this lifting verification process occurs before even more costly heavy lift boats are deployed to the site.

This method of verification is both time-consuming and expensive.

However, these milling methods do not completely sever multiple, nested non-concentric tubulars for well abandonment.

However, this method does not permit 360 degree circumferential severance of multiple, nested tubulars and is not suited for the purpose of well abandonment.

Images