A Multi-Actuator Cooperative Control Allocation Method Oriented to Integrated Control of Attitude and Orbit
A technology with multiple actuators and distribution methods, applied in attitude control, non-electric variable control, control/regulation system, etc., can solve the problems of low fuel usage rate and less mutual cooperation of thrusters, so as to improve use efficiency and expand easily Effects on sex and flexibility
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
specific Embodiment approach 1
[0018] Specific implementation mode one: as figure 1 with figure 2 As shown, a multi-actuator cooperative control distribution method for integrated control of attitude and orbit includes the following steps:
[0019] Step 1: According to the desired control force F c , using the thrust correction coefficient optimization model oriented to the minimum thrust distribution error, transform the thrust correction coefficient optimization model into a standard linear programming model, solve the desired thrust correction factor k, and calculate the output desired control force F m,c ;
[0020] Among them, the expected thrust correction factor k is to correct the expected thrust when the expected control quantity exceeds the output capability range of the actuator.
[0021] f m,c = kF c (16)
[0022] Step 2: For the thruster, control the torque T according to the expectation c and the output expected control force F obtained in step 1 m,c , using the hybrid optimization mo...
specific Embodiment approach 2
[0030] Specific implementation mode two: the difference between this implementation mode and specific implementation mode one is: the thrust correction coefficient optimization model in the step one is specifically:
[0031] Min J=-k (1)
[0032] St.Bu=kF c (2)
[0033] u i,min i i,max ,i=1,2,...,n (3)
[0034] where u i is the i-th thruster, n is the number of thrusters (representing a matrix with n columns), k is the thrust correction coefficient, B is the thrust control efficiency matrix of the thruster, u is the control command of the thruster, and J is the objective function.
[0035] Other steps and parameters are the same as those in Embodiment 1.
specific Embodiment approach 3
[0036] Specific implementation mode three: the difference between this implementation mode and specific implementation mode one or two is: in the step one, the specific form of converting the thrust correction coefficient optimization model into a standard linear programming model is:
[0037]
[0038] where u max =[u 1,max u 2,max … u n,max ] T , u min =[u 1,min u 2,min … u n,min ] T , I p×q Represents a p-row and q-column matrix whose elements are all 1, 0 p×qRepresents a p-row and q-column matrix whose elements are all 0, I 3×n Represents a 3-row n-column matrix with elements 1, 0 3×n Represents a 3-row n-column matrix with elements 0, 0 3×1 Represents a matrix with 3 rows and 1 column whose elements are 0, 0 1×n Represents a 1-row and n-column matrix with elements of 0, and there are n thrusters that have n-column matrix, and u + = u max -u,u _ =u-u min .
[0039] Other steps and parameters are the same as those in Embodiment 1 or Embodiment 2.
PUM
Login to View More Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More - R&D
- Intellectual Property
- Life Sciences
- Materials
- Tech Scout
- Unparalleled Data Quality
- Higher Quality Content
- 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Browse by: Latest US Patents, China's latest patents, Technical Efficacy Thesaurus, Application Domain, Technology Topic, Popular Technical Reports.
© 2025 PatSnap. All rights reserved.Legal|Privacy policy|Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement|Sitemap|About US| Contact US: help@patsnap.com



