Flame retardant polycarbonate composition, method of making and of using the same
A technology of polycarbonate and composition, which is applied in the field of flame-retardant polycarbonate composition, and can solve problems such as unsatisfactory
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
Embodiment 1-10
[0107] According to Table 4 and the properties shown, Examples E1 to E10 were prepared. Temp. refers to the temperature.
[0108] As shown in Examples E1 and E3, the combination of phosphine oxide FR additive (TPPO) and EXL can result in a UL94V0 rating at a thickness of 0.6 mm or less and an impact strength greater than 500 J / m at a temperature of 23°C (NII ), while maintaining satisfactory material flow capability. As shown in Example E2, replacement of the phosphine additive of Example El with a phosphate ester FR additive (BPADP) resulted in lower MFR values, reduced impact strength, and reduced FR performance. As shown in Examples E4 and E10, compositions without EXL have poor flame and impact properties.
[0109]
[0110]
[0111] N.R. stands for No Rating, where samples show extremely low flame performance and fail to achieve the UL94 standard
[0112] Example E3 shows that the composition has good flame retardancy even at 0.5mm and good impact strength at 23°C...
Embodiment approach 1
[0114] Embodiment 1: A composition comprising 55 to 85wt% polycarbonate, 10 to 25wt% organopolysiloxane-polycarbonate block copolymer, 5 to 15wt% based on the total weight of the composition Phosphine oxide, and 0 to 3 wt % impact modifier.
Embodiment approach 2
[0115] Embodiment 2: The composition according to Embodiment 1, wherein the phosphine oxide comprises triphenylphosphine oxide.
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| melt flow index | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| molecular weight | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| molecular weight | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


