Inflatable wing with active canopy profile control

Abstract

An aerodynamic wing formed by a flexible canopy with an internally routed canopy line for controlling the canopy profile. Preferably, the canopy line is routed through a gatherable tube secured to the trailing edge of the canopy. Tensioning the canopy line alters the canopy profile to facilitate launching the kite.

Description

FIELD OF THE PRESENT INVENTION [0001] The present invention relates generally to inflatable power or traction kites. More particularly, the invention relates to an inflatable kite having a canopy profile that can be actively controlled. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] Recently, considerable effort is being expended to develop wings capable of generating tractive force for the purposes of powering a user on a variety of vehicles that are tethered solely by flexible lines. Such wings can generally be considered kites. The development of kites capable of generating significant force has made possible numerous recreational pursuits. For example, kite surfing or kite boarding refers to a sport involving the use of a wind powered wing to pull the participant on a vehicle across a body of water. Similar sports involving the use of appropriately configured vehicles to traverse sand, earth, snow and ice are also being pursued. One of skill in the art will also recognize that wind powered ...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

[0010] It is also an object of the invention to provide a syst

Problems solved by technology

Despite the success of LEI kite designs, they do present certain, inherent challenges.

Unfortunately, improving one aspect of a given airfoil often degrades performance in other areas.

For example, attempts to improve the performance of a kite by increasing the aspect ratio of the wing typically makes the kite more difficult to relaunch.

Similarly, one aspect of a kite's efficiency is its lift to drag ratio, but increasing this ratio can have adverse effects on the handling of the kite.

Thus, obtaining a desirable balance of characteristics can be difficult.

A related issue is that different characteristics may be desirable for different users or under different conditions.

However, this type of trim control does not offer any means for controlling the canopy's profile.

Thus, these prior art systems do not offer a method for altering the characteristics of the canopy's airfoil.

As discussed above, kites having relatively high aspect ratios can be difficult to relaunch.

However, the problems associated with relaunching a kite are exacerbated when the kite is used on a relatively low friction surface, such as sand, snow and ice.

Indeed, relaunching a conventional four-line kite on snow, regardless of aspect ratio, is extremely difficult and usually requires the use of a fifth line attached to the trailing edge of the kite.

Thus, improving the relaunchability of a kite generally either constrains the aspect ratio or requires additional design elements.

Prior art attempts to add design elements to improve the relaunchability of kites have not been completely successful.

However, the bridle system generally decreases the responsiveness of the kite to turning input.

However, the stopper arrangement requires a relatively complex interconnection, which is subject to fouling.

Further, both of these prior art methods involve the use of an external line at the trailing edge which can catch on foreign objects, presenting a significant safety problem, and also creates durability and convenience issues while increasing air resistance.

Images