Shrinkage compensating concrete
a concrete and compression technology, applied in the direction of chemistry apparatus and processes, other chemical processes, etc., can solve the problems of constraint characteristics of the present concrete that have not been achieved before, and achieve the effect of reducing the stress
- Summary
- Abstract
- Description
- Claims
- Application Information
AI Technical Summary
Benefits of technology
Problems solved by technology
Method used
Image
Examples
example i
[0041] Specimens were prepared according to ASTM standard C 878. All specimens were poured in C 878 molds so as to contain ninety cubic inches of concrete and have the dimensions 3″×3″×10″.
[0042] The fibers used had the following characteristics, as described by their vendors:
PolypropylenePVADensity (g · cm−3)0.911.3Tensile Strength90-110 ksi160 N / mm2Modulus of elasticity 500 ksi 37 kN / mm2
[0043] One half cubic foot batches of concrete were prepared. Each half cubic foot contained 9.63 pounds (520 pounds per cubic yard [pcy]) Portland cement and 1.67 pounds (90 pcy) of an expansive material (Komponent® manufactured by CTS Cement Company, Cypress, Calif.). Expansive materials are typically added to Portland cements in amount of 5-20% according to requirements of the cement industry. After the Portland cement and expensive material were mixed, 0.041 pounds of fibers were added and incorporated into the mixture, representing 2.2 pcy, 34.26 pounds (1850 pcy) ¾″ sto...
example ii
Field Testing
[0049] In order to confirm the results of laboratory testing on a larger scale, a field test was carried out in which slabs were placed on compacted fill. The slabs were 6 inches thick, 50 feet or 24 feet long and 6 feet wide. The concrete mix was the same as that used for the laboratory testing. One pair of slabs used Portland cement and had #4 rebar 24″ on center each way. One pair of slabs used shrinkage compensating cement and had #4 rebars 24″ on center each way. One pair of slabs simply used polypropylene fibers-reinforced shrinkage compensating concrete and no rebar. The slabs were wet-cured for seven days and allowed to air dry. Dial gauges were placed at both ends of each slab. Readings were taken daily for a week and weekly for a month. FIG. 3 shows the results of this field testing.
[0050] The fiber-reinforced concrete performed comparably or better than the slabs with shrinkage compensating cement and rebars. All slabs with shrinkage compensating cement per...
example iii
Full Scale Field Test
[0053] An additional full scale test was made with the test floor having four 8 inch thick slabs, and two 6 inch thick slabs, constructed with 1725 cubic yards of concrete and fibers as described above. Each slab was about 110 feet by 130 feet. No conventional shrinkage saw cuts or steel reinforcing were used. The concrete was finished with a conventional automated laser screed machine, resulting in an exceptionally flat floor (FF=99.8) at the time of construction. The machine was able to screed the concrete quickly and efficiently because there was no rebar to impede the work.
[0054] Three modified ASTM expansion bars were made on each of the six concrete placement days, for a total of 18 bars, utilizing the fibers in the mix to provide restraint against expansion. At 7 days of moist curing, the average expansion was 0.045% (range 0.031% to 0.052%), after which the bars were removed from the moist cure. After 21 days of air drying, the average expansion was 0....
PUM
| Property | Measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Pressure | aaaaa | aaaaa |
| Pressure | aaaaa | aaaaa |
Abstract
Description
Claims
Application Information
Login to View More 


