Furthermore, the returned containers alleviate the assembly
plant's task and associated costs with storing, destroying, or otherwise disposing of the containers.
While returnable and reusable containers reduce costs by eliminating the need to constantly purchase new containers and reduce disposal costs, it may still be relatively costly to provide for their return shipment.
Therefore, there was not much of a shipping
cost savings when returning empty reusable containers even though empty containers weighed less.
Furthermore, the cost of storing conventional reusable containers may further reduce the other
economic benefits they offer because empty containers also require the same warehouse or storage space as full containers.
Storage space is valuable and may be limited, and it is usually desirable to utilize the space for something other than bulky, empty containers waiting to be shipped or returned.
Additionally, collapsed, stored containers require substantially less storage space.
While some such containers address the issue of return shipment and storage costs, they still have certain drawbacks.
The dunnage elements are then discarded or otherwise disposed of by the assembly plant, further adding to the plant's overall cost for the shipment.
Furthermore, the supplier incurs additional costs by constructing or acquiring new dunnage elements each time the returned container is reused.
Additionally, the labor costs associated with constructing and installing dunnage elements in a container, and the additional labor for collapsing, removing and disposing of the dunnage elements after shipment, further increases the overall cost of shipping product utilizing conventional containers.
Therefore, even with existing collapsible, returnable containers, high shipping costs may be incurred on both ends, i.e., by the supplier who constantly acquires new dunnage elements and by the assembly plant which constantly must dispose of the old dunnage elements or pay to have those dunnage elements returned with the container.
Moreover, dunnage elements, depending on the size of the container, may be heavy, and as such, the assembly of the dunnage elements to accept a product can be physically stressful for the worker and may lead to job related injuries.
Job related injuries increase costs.
Additionally, because someone must physically assemble the dunnage, the dunnage elements and the containers have been limited in size and weight in accordance with what an average worker can physically and safely erect.
Some existing containers are difficult to access which makes removal of the parts therein difficult and
time consuming.
Any
delay in access and removal of the part from the container is undesirable.
The size and / or weight of the parts or work pieces may cause stress or strain on the line worker, and more particularly on the back of the worker when inserting or removing parts from such a container.
Such ergonomically unfriendly movements may cause
physical trauma, pain, and other injuries that may lead to lost production time.
This requires space around the container which may not be available, depending on the physical
layout of the plant or facility.
The length (front to back) of certain containers may be limited because the container manufacturer needs to eliminate the need for a line worker to walk around the container to remove product from inside the container.
The more containers needed to ship a predetermined number of parts, the greater the cost to the shipper.
This movement by the line worker is ergonomically unfriendly because the line worker must lean forward and bend down into the container to insert or remove a part or work piece from the bottom of the container.
Depending upon the number of times the line worker repeats this unnatural motion into the interior of the container, strain in the back, legs and arms may result.
The size and / or weight of the parts or work pieces may increase the strain on the line worker.
Thus, simply removing multiple parts during a work day may cause
physical trauma, pain, and other injuries that may lead to lost production time.
One of the difficulties encountered with existing dunnage located inside known collapsible containers is that the dunnage may not adequately protect the parts placed therein during shipment.
Often the parts rest on the bottom of the
cell, thereby straining the connection or joint between this member of the
cell and the vertically oriented side portions or members of the
cell.
Again, the parts may rest on the bottom of the pouches, thereby creating stress or strain on the pouches which may cause one or more pouches to tear or otherwise be damaged.
Additionally, parts or products residing in the dunnage may become damaged if they shift or move during shipment.