Cattle Feeding System and Shelter to Create a Controlled Environment

Abstract

An improved cattle feeding system and shelter. The shelter has a building foundation frame extending upwardly from the ground with an awning frame extending upwardly from the foundation frame and over it. This allows for an awning to be placed over the shelter frame to at least partially enclose it. The awning has a portion which is optionally opened to selectively allow air ventilation or catching the warmth of a southern sun exposure. The shelter has a drover's alley gate configuration which may be placed within the interior of the building to help control animal movements. The entire system is built on a partial cement floor of a configuration which enhances cleanliness inside of the shelter.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS[0001]This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12 / 128,182 filed May 28, 2008 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11 / 370,971 filed Mar. 8, 2006 and is now abandoned. Both documents are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.FIELD OF THE INVENTION[0002]This invention relates to a cattle feeding system and a shelter for use in that system.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION[0003]The present invention relates generally to a cattle feeding system and to a shelter used in that system to create a controlled environment that protects the beef animal from environmental extremes. It also is a system which minimizes pollution risks.[0004]Conventional open cattle feedlots have fence-line feed bunks and a concrete apron in front of the bunk for the cattle to stand on while eating; but, the rest of the dirt feedlot is open to the sun, wind, snow, rain and resulting mud and wind chill. Conventi...

AI Technical Summary

Benefits of technology

"The present invention is an improved cattle feeding system and shelter that maintains the cattle within their thermo neutral zones, year around. The shelter has an awning frame that allows for air ventilation, wind protection or catching the warmth of a southern sun exposure. The awning frame has a portion that extends outwardly to the south over the foundation frame to support an extendable and retractable awning that may hang over the south facing foundation frame to provide shade or be drawn up in a retracted position to allow the sun to enter for warmth. The entire system is built on a partial cement floor and a deep bedded area over a limestone pack in a configuration which enhances cleanliness inside of the shelter and minimizes pollution outside of the shelter. The feed bunk boards are held in a unique bracket system that allows easy repair and replacement."

Problems solved by technology

Conventional open cattle feedlots have fence-line feed bunks and a concrete apron in front of the bunk for the cattle to stand on while eating; but, the rest of the dirt feedlot is open to the sun, wind, snow, rain and resulting mud and wind chill.

Conventional systems do not protect the beef animal from extreme weather stresses.

The associated stresses from the conventional beef system lead to decreased feed efficiency, lower weight-gains, disease development, and higher death loss.

In addition, the conventional system is more labor intensive, because the mud lots must be repeatedly scraped and dirt mounds built in an attempt to keep the animals out of the snow and mud.

This increases labor expense.

A larger concern for conventional cattle feeding systems is the potential for polluting the environment with manure runoff from the open lots after a rain or snow melt.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is enforcing new rules to prevent the pollution of streams and ditches next to conventional cattle feedlots and is requiring expensive containment basins or lagoons to be built to prevent run off from open feedlots.

The result of lagoons and containment basins is the creation of an odor problem from the breakdown of the liquid manure that is contained in them.

Consequently, the solution to water pollution creates air pollution.

This trade off of one type of pollution for another is not acceptable.

As a result of many of these difficulties the cattle feeding business has moved away from the Midwest farm belt for among other reasons, in order to avoid the weather extremes since it is known that these weather extremes cause energy expenditure by the cattle and therefore decrease feed efficiency.

For example, research at Kansas State University and the University of Nebraska has found that cattle that are in mud have wet hair and they are out of their thermo neutral temperature zone and thus have significantly lower rates of gain and poorer feed efficiency.

Disease is also notably lacking.

In situations where the hair coat becomes wet cattle lose the ability to insulate themselves and as a result their maintenance requirements increase dramatically.

Wind chill from the strong prevailing northwest winds also dramatically increases the animal's energy requirements.

There is, however, no control of feeding or design to eliminate or minimize manure and air pollution or is there adjustability to weather extremes.

This too does nothing to eliminate some of the water and air pollution risk, nor does it allow flexibility of change in shelter structure to reflect change in environmental condition.

Simulating cattle feeding in a controlled environment is not an easy endeavor.

Open cattle feedlots are further complicated with humane animal husbandry criteria, such as providing access to bedding to provide a dry comfortable area for the cattle to lie on and to be protected from the sun, cold, wind, rain and mud.

These large feedlots are not typically inclined to use a controlled environment.

Conventional cattle feeding systems usually have several hundred cattle in a pen and may not have adequate bunk and water space so that cattle, a herd animal, can all have easy access to water and feed.

Images